Breathing New Life into Old Biological Studies with GIS

in #steemstem7 years ago (edited)

What happens to lost and forgotten knowledge? That is to say, where do the studies that are not recognized in peer-reviewed journals go to languish? Many research projects are never formally published because they lack mass appeal, fail to show significant results, or are not held to the same rigorous standards that these journals require. This does not mean that the studies are worthless or that the information is necessarily invalid; all objective data has some worth as a snapshot in time.

The studies discussed in this article are real research projects conducted in Como Park, a large urban park in Saint Paul, Minnesota. The studies all center around a shallow lake in the park known as Como Lake. It is a low point collection basin for the park and the water quality of the lake is impaired like many urban waters. The studies focus on wildlife and collectively examine the turtles, macro-invertebrates, and birds in the lake and surrounding woodlands.

Each study was performed by a different group and each has a unique style and amount of detail. The studies all have a spatial component, but none of them have been digitized or visually displayed aside from a simple map that appears in two of the studies. The chances of someone randomly finding the studies hidden on the local government website, reading through them, and gleaning any sort of useful information seem relatively unlikely. However, when the data is summarized, digitized, and displayed spatially, it becomes accessible to a much larger audience at a glance.


Bird Study

Some adorable baby birds | Source

The Bird Study is a 7-page word document released by two community members in 2006. The study discusses data collected by several volunteers who walked a series of circuits through the park. The objective was to document the number of species and individuals that are found in different parts of the park and describe the habitats encountered. There are no images, maps, or diagrams with the study, but the seven different walking routes are described in sufficient detail to extract a rough polygon encompassing the observed areas.

Graphic summarizing the finding fo the Bird Study with color-coded labeled polygons showing the best (warm colors) and worst (cool colors) places to observe birds.

Web-based version of the Bird data showing an interactive popup that summarizes the relevant information for each study area.

Numerical data about the number of species and text data regarding the species names and types of vegetation along each path are also included in the document. This data was appended to the polygon shapefiles defining the study areas. The numerical data on species counts is used above to color-code the polygons and highlight the areas where the highest concentration of bird species can be found.

Unfortunately this is as far as the Bird Study goes. It includes a limited amount of observational data collected by different people at different times, making data standardization difficult. The study areas are different sizes and the authors conclude that this is main cause for the difference in bird numbers. The spatial assessment seems to mostly agree with this conclusion, yielding a blueprint for an improved future bird study with data normalization.


Bug Study


Photo from the Bug Study showing the process of macro-invertebrate sample collection.

The Bug Study is an 11-page word document that was produced in 2007 as a partial requirement for the grant that funded the study. It is more elaborate than the Bird Study and comes complete with photos, an area map, several pie and bar charts, and a more clearly defined set of methods. The objective was to look at the species diversity (taxa) and density of macro-invertebrates around the lake as an indicator of water quality. In the study, six sections of the lake near the shoreline were sampled monthly for five months. The number of unique macro-invertebrate species and the total number of macro-invertebrates in the samples were recorded and included in summary charts.

Map included with the study (left) and inferred GIS polygons (right) for the study areas.

The spatial component of this study was traced on a map included with the study. The six areas outlined on this map were traced as rectangular polygons to encapsulate the randomly chosen shallow water sampling locations from in the study. Both the taxa and total count data is numerical and can be used as the color ramp categorized classification key. Since sampling was done over the course of 5 months, this data also has a temporal component that can be made into an animation.

At first glance, the seasonal variation in macro-invertebrate density and location is apparent. Rather than one section of the lake being the 'hot spot', the most productive macro-invertebrate areas change with the months. Only by averaging the monthly data do the best areas to find macro-invertebrates become more clear.

Color-coded look at the average values for count and species diversity.

Without question, the east and west sides of the lake have the highest concentrations of both macro-invertebrate species and total organisms. The bay at the north end of the lake also serves as a decent habitat for macro-invertebrates, while the south end clearly has the lowest number. This finding suggests that the water quality on the south side of the lake is worse than other shores, though part of this effect may be due to the decrease in direct solar radiation on north-facing slopes in the Northern Hemisphere.


Turtle Study

A photo from the Turtle Study showing a large painted turtle being removed from the trap to be measured.

The Turtle Study is the most comprehensive study of the three. It is a 51-page PDF that was authored in 2011 by the Como Community Council, although the majority of the document is comprised of photographs and raw data with no figures and only a couple summary tables. Although a simple map of the study area is included, no attempt was made to visualize the results of the study spatially. Using the map, the shoreline sections of the study were traced as polylines to digitize the data. The project is a two-part study of the quantity and dimension range of turtles in Como Lake.

The map included with the Turtle Study (left) and a GIS line representation of the study section data with random colors (right).

The first part of the study is similar to the Bird Study in that is an observation-based analysis of the number of turtles that sun themselves along the lake shore. The study differentiates by species and identified both painted and snapping turtles. Observations were made by volunteers over the course of 85 days by walking around the lake. The lake was divided into 13 different sections and the number of turtles observed in each section each day was recorded. A total count over the course of the study was extracted from a table and appended to the section line polygons. The same color ramps used above were applied to visualize the number of painted and snapping turtles observed in the sections.

Warm colors represent popular turtle basking areas, cool colors the contrary.

In this study, painted turtles seemed to predominantly prefer sunning themselves in the bays at the north (sections 1 & 13) and south (sections 6-8) ends of the lake. The peninsula jutting out in the center of the lake (section 3) was also a popular spot, but the areas where macro-invertebrates thrived do not seem as popular with the turtles. Snapping turtles are much less common and they were most frequently spotted on the beaches in sections 4, 7, and 9. If you hate turtles, your safest bet is to visit the manmade docks in section 12 where only one turtle was spotted during the study. Note that the observed numbers in this part of the study do not necessarily represent unique turtles, as observations were made on different days from a distance and without identifying individuals.

The second part of the study involved setting three turtle traps in different parts of the lake and measuring the diameter and weight of the turtles recovered from the trap. The study authors received a permit from the Minnesota DNR to trap and analyze turtle attributes. The locations of the 3 traps can be seen on the study map, but the turtle size measurement data was not spatially summarized in the study and was not included in this analysis.


Other Como Data

The studies addressed in this article are not the only studies available for Como Park. At the very minimum, there are nearly 50 years of fish population surveys available from the DNR, and multiple watershed and water quality studies from the Capital Region Watershed District. These studies have also been summarized and compiled as layers on an interactive map that will soon be available on the District 10 Como Park website! I may present a similar GIS analysis of these studies in a future post. I bet your city has similar data just waiting to be uncovered!

A sneak preview of the upcoming D10 Map!

Closing Remarks

Although these studies may lack some of the requirements for being published in a peer-reviewed journal, they are generally objective studies that provide a unique temporal snapshot into the state of wildlife in Como Park. Many hours of volunteer efforts went into collecting the data for these studies, and no comparable studies for this lake have ever been conducted that I can find. By compiling the text and summarizing the pertinent data into a few polygons and graphics, the information can be quickly and easily digested by a much larger audience than is likely to read through the studies otherwise.

The lack of spatial analysis in the earlier studies might be to the gradual adoption of GIS into different fields. As more people realize the power and potential of spatial data, one can hope that the free and transparent dissemination of all types of information becomes commonplace. Putting data on the blockchain is a great start!


Thank you for reading my post! All diagrams and animations by the author. Photos are taken from the studies and from Pixabay for the cover and as noted. See the studies, references, and additional reading as embedded links. I have no idea what caused the ghostly reflection in the lakes in many of the figures - perhaps the OpenLayers plugin or a bug with Google's imagery. Either way, I kind of like it!

Sort:  
There are 2 pages
Pages

Actually, the main topic of this post (not the Como example but the rest) is super important.

Concerning what you said in the very first paragraph, I am for instance happy to work within a community where articles are posted on the web before being even submitted to a journal. As a result, everything is available for free, even the non-published stuff. And sometimes, non-published stuff is very useful!

To come back to the other point (beyond the example) of your articles, data preservation is an actual question in science today. A large amount of financial and human efforts is injected in many studies, and having these disappearing from the landscape is at the end of the day a waste of resources, IMO. It is therefore the reason why digitizing and open access are primordial.

Thanks very good post !!!!

Awesome Work!

Keep it up!!!

@cryptoinvestinfo

your CryptoInvestmentExpert

Many research projects are never formally published because they lack mass appeal, fail to show significant results, or are not held to the same rigorous standards that these journals require.

Lemouth is Correct

and a significant number of studies are not published because the author couldn't afford entry fees to the "Publishing Machine" which rules the science world. There are a significant number of studies which are excellent, which were done by financially poor scientists.

Fortunately, there are systems being created now which allow scientists to publish their works without having to pay substantial fees. :)

Some of such systems exist for about 20 years :)

Thanks for your thoughts! I am glad to hear that there are communities of researchers sharing data and knowledge. The amount of money and effort that goes into conducting these studies is too great to not preserve the results in some fashion.

Great job on this post, I love it, keep up the great work! I really do enjoy seeing quality research articles on the SteemIt platform, and I hope you continue to post them!

Thank you! I have several future posts in the works, so stay tuned!

Wow! Amazing work @gra. Your added emphasis of the data is wonderful and your idea to digitize and include the results all in one spot is admirable. This is an example of the power of the STEEM block chain. I hope it catches the eye of some others!

yup, Very Well said!!

I appreciate your support! I am so thankful to have Steemit and SteemSTEM as a venue to share my thoughts, preserve these ideas, and get useful feedback!

We are glad to have you here as well!

Hi @gra, one of your friends @zest pointed me to you when I mentioned that I worked in GIS (now retired, running my own little guesthouse). What a fascinating post! GIS sadly still is in it's infancy here in South Africa, as you rightly pointed out would be immensely valuable in many fields. Thank you for publishing this here on steemit :)

Thanks for checking out my post...the guesthouse retirement sounds like a nice gig! I am glad Zest pointed you my way.

I think I'll make it one of my main objectives on here to show how spatial data can be applied to different disciplines!

Look forward to that and yes the guesthouse is great, meeting interesting people from all over the world. Did not realise the need for short term accommodation is this big, busier now than ever before but loving it :) Thank you!

Reading this had the odd effect of making me, for several minutes, imagine all sorts of non-appropriate things being spatially digitized, like philosophy papers for example! Interesting!

That is the right way to think about things! I bet you could figure out a way to digitize aspects of papers. Maybe the locations of the authors and date of publishing could be used to track the progression of different ideas through society...sounds like a challenge!

Totally deserves a 50% curie upvote. :) I think your work gra is beyond excellent. Thanks for sharing. XD

I am glad you enjoyed my post. Thank you for the kind words!

I like this and will read it again. I am a surveyer in the private sector. I use precision GPS equipment on a daily basis. I also have a passion for mycology and arboriculture. While I'm working my mind is always racing and trying to devise ways of coupling the data I am collecting with other areas of study. Thank you for the article. I will read it again.

Thank you for the comment! I am glad that my article can serve as an inspiration! You probably stumble across all kinds of cool things while surveying that could be mapped...I wish I had access to precision GPS!

Now the only limitation is my imagination! Ha!

Setting up and maintaining an open source world document management software similar to wikipedia where documents could be tagged similar to the way we tag content here in steemit would be an awesome way to give visibility and offer the contents worldwide. I am not sure, but believe, a similar idea with cooking recipees from restaurants all over the world is what El Bulli foundation, managed by the world famous chef Ferran Adria is setting up.

I agree, this seems like an inevitable next step in making information more accessible to everyone. Interesting bit about the recipes, I found this link on the story for those who want to know more. Thanks for sharing!

This is really cool. Thanks for sharing. I love puting data onto the blockchain.

Thanks! I do too, I think it might be my calling!

Just fantastic!

What you raise in the first paragraph is totally true and is something that is seen all over the globe. Unfortunately there are countries like where I live that have added problems, such as politicians and economists who do not allow it to be published in any magazine, much less be investigated.

Congratulations to steemit and @gra

A greeting from Venezuela.

J-Davis

That kind of censorship is indeed unfortunate. Thanks for your perspective!

Yes, an unfortunate and regrettable situation.

Nice work! It really impresses me how much GIS can do for all fields, not just geology.

What an interesting article thank you. You're so right, studies that are perfectly clear and understandable often get overlooked. You outline exactly what took place and in readable form. That it should go digital is a no-brainer, but without people such as you who can point out the value of past neglected studies, we're none the wiser. Now we know!

Thank you! I can only draw attention to a very small portion of the neglected studies, but it is rewarding to honor past work and preserve it in a readable form.

😍A very informative post. Great job. Keep it up! 😍
OpenMusic Steemit Kiss.gif

Really amazing intersting post! thanks...

You did a fantastic job, you have done a lots of research I think, there are many important topics in your post that you had mentioned to keep eye on it. Intelligent post.
regards

It's a good ideal. I think this kind of method is one of the most valuable application of block chain.

I like your style of writting...I like your posts. Good work :)

Thank you!

A great project..that is very interesting to edication future..i hope that will be succes..@gra.

I simply love your articles, what great content and quality of posting you offer the community here on Steemit and abroad.

Thanks a lot :)

what about archaeological studies of past religions and cultures

Loading...

Congratulations @gra! You have completed some achievement on Steemit and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :

Award for the number of upvotes

Click on any badge to view your own Board of Honor on SteemitBoard.
For more information about SteemitBoard, click here

If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

By upvoting this notification, you can help all Steemit users. Learn how here!

Great work @gra. You even added emphasis of the data, wonderful. I've got my eye on you. I'll always look out for you now...

Interesting read!

I know a coin that can help spatial data, it is called Streamer Data coin
( DATA) and it aims to monetize data and make it more accessible to implement in real-time applications!

I love how interesting lost information is and i often wonder how much knowledge humanity has lost in the eons since we first put quill to scroll?

I find that knowledge can be suppressed due to the scientific communities beliefs. The new research may contradict more influential researchers and their findings, thus it is discredited through pure selfishness and at a great loss to humanity.

I found an article that talked about how some German scientists found a book from the late 1800's on the brain. The researcher had described in depth, a missing link between the cerebellum and the frontal cortex.

However, this researchers findings contradicted the widely held scientific views at the time and he was painted as a charlotten.

The Research that had been lost to time for over 130 years, enriched our current knowledge and took away much uncertainty in this field.

Interesting on the Streamr concept, I am glad to hear that more options for data preservation are popping up! It seems to focus on real-time data like traffic, but I bet it could be expanded for other types of data. Thanks for the comment!

Congratulations @gra, this post is the most rewarded post (based on pending payouts) in the last 12 hours written by a User account holder (accounts that hold between 0.1 and 1.0 Mega Vests). The total number of posts by User account holders during this period was 2563 and the total pending payments to posts in this category was $2547.46. To see the full list of highest paid posts across all accounts categories, click here.

If you do not wish to receive these messages in future, please reply stop to this comment.

Congratulations @gra! You have completed some achievement on Steemit and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :

Award for the number of upvotes received

Click on any badge to view your own Board of Honor on SteemitBoard.
For more information about SteemitBoard, click here

If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

By upvoting this notification, you can help all Steemit users. Learn how here!

nice dear......vote 4u

Good msg sir i like it

Congratulations, your post received one of the top 10 most powerful upvotes in the last 12 hours. You received an upvote from @curie valued at 103.21 SBD, based on the pending payout at the time the data was extracted.

If you do not wish to receive these messages in future, reply with the word "stop".

Congratulations, your post received one of the top 10 most powerful upvotes in the last 12 hours. You received an upvote from @hendrikdegrote valued at 63.90 SBD, based on the pending payout at the time the data was extracted.

If you do not wish to receive these messages in future, reply with the word "stop".

Congratulations @gra!
Your post was mentioned in the hit parade in the following category:

  • Pending payout - Ranked 3 with $ 218,31

Congratulations @gra! You have completed some achievement on Steemit and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :

Award for the number of upvotes
Award for the total payout received

Click on any badge to view your own Board of Honor on SteemitBoard.
For more information about SteemitBoard, click here

If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

By upvoting this notification, you can help all Steemit users. Learn how here!

The @OriginalWorks bot has determined this post by @gra to be original material and upvoted(1.5%) it!

ezgif.com-resize.gif

To call @OriginalWorks, simply reply to any post with @originalworks or !originalworks in your message!

Their enemy is the people. People who throwing plactics to the ocean.

Amaizing Post!!!!
Join-Now-loop.gif

Vota por mi, sigueme y comprate mis redes
DgCarlosLeon en Steemit, Instagram, Twitter, Facebook

this is a great post ...

plz help & upvote & follow me bro.............................

very very nice post.......

thank you.. it was a nice post..

Many research projects are never formally published because they lack mass appeal, fail to show significant results, or are not held to the same rigorous standards that these journals require.

ACTUALLY a Significant Number of Studies are Never

published, because the author couldn't afford entry fees to the "Publishing Machine" which rules the science world. There are a significant number of studies which are excellent, which were done by financially poor scientists.

Fortunately, there are systems being created now which allow scientists to publish their works without having to pay substantial fees. :)

Beautiful Post

Nice story. . photo :)

Te votado y comentado me va a seguir

Thanks following

There are 2 pages
Pages