You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: How to Cope with Stress (Part 2). Adaptive vs Maladaptive Coping Strategies

in #steemstem7 years ago (edited)

Depending on where one stands on Buddhism I might praise it or argue against it.

Lol! You like buzzing people, don't you! :D

I like the title Sex and the Sexes!

Take it if you think it might fit somewhere. I would be flattered :D

Sort:  

Lol! You like buzzing people, don't you! :D

Guilty! :D

Do you know about the reputation of Socrates as a gadfly? Philosophy is meant to unsettle people!

Lol. I knew it. Philosophers always try to cause trouble! That's why I have never liked these guys. :D

😢

Oh, no, the sad face. OK. I don't like some philosophers. Like Schopenhauer :)

What's wrong with him? He's stylistically superb with a wit that's sharper than ... well he'd know what analogy to use here, cos he's witty. Just because he likes to sprinkle his philosophy with some melancholy here and there is not a sufficient cause for derision :(

I am fooling around :D

To be honest, I am not very familiar with him. I don't know much about his work except for ONE thing - his view of women. Perhaps this is the main reason why I have put him in my blacklist :D On the first page to be exact :P

Ah, yeah, he was a famous misogynist. And, in his case, unlike many others, he can perhaps own the term. Cos unlike Hamlet, Nick Cave, or Nietzsche, etc., who said (or sang) negative things about women because of hurt and a very strong romantic streak that got frustrated by how real women compare to the ideal, Schopenhauer instead was very rational about it, saw the matter very practically, and in a sense wisely, since at least he found a way to live with it and get the better of the situation, instead of getting lost in booze and nihilism like Bukowski or somebody like that!