On a related note, the push of the warrior woman as a realistic depiction of women's capabilities in the realm of the physical is beyond absurd. Together with the deconstruction of chivalry as a cultural good by labeling it "toxic masculinity" (which includes the principle of not striking a woman or initiating violence for non-defensive reasons) this puts women at an increased risk of physical confrontations with men.
Recently I was privileged enough to engage in a conversation about women in law enforcement. In most regions, female police officers are not allowed to patrol in F/F pairs, there must always be a male police officer with the female police officer. I opined this was a reasonable precaution, because two women simply are not enough in most circumstances to restrain a single male, even an untrained one. This of course resulted in a heated debate about my biases.
I politely told them they were mistaken and that media depictions of women had inaccurately colored their understanding of the differences between men and women in the physical realm. I was denounced. Accused of being sexist. Of course women can fight as well as men! I asked them if two female police officers could restrain one man as they claimed, how easy would it be for three? A unanimous chorus of "super easy!"
I showed them this. I pointed out that a single case doesn't prove the rule of course, but it is still wiser to pair male with female officers for the female officers' safety. In the ensuing silence, I made good my farewells.
Yeah, the bias of recognizing the male body is inherently constructed to be more physically strong... how dare you :P