I'd look at making governance more inclusive by giving smaller stakeholders a bigger voice through quadratic voting if such a system could be implemented.
I'd introduce an inflation model that adjusts gradually according to network activity, so rewards stay fair while long-term inflation keeps declining.
I'd also add a light “eco-burn” system that removes a small number of tokens from circulation when high-resource actions are performed, creating a better balance between growth and scarcity. (We already have the @null account but no automatic burning mechanism that I know of...)
!ALIVE
!BBH
Either that or limit the influence of the bigger accounts...
I think a burn mechanisme could be great but foremost, we would need to change the model so that the inflation is clear and precise. Now there are so many loose pieces and plenty of ways to calculate the inflation. There is the coded hive inflation that is around 8% but then there is an artificial inflation through HBD interests. And a supply increase through everything that comes through the DHF. When the money is in DHF it's not accessible and it has no influence on token price. But once it's paid out, it dillutes the stake of all the remaining token holders if demand for Hive doesn't increase...