You see, this is my point. Ned did not break that promise, he simply sold his stake to someone else. The witnesses then decided that Justin was going to use that stake to vote them out, so they froze it.
Lest us not we forget, that the @freedom vote was powered up by ninja-mined Steem, so you could argue that the promise was broken a long time ago, but nobody said boo to a goose then. Now suddenly they're outraged.
Just seems a bit disingenuous to me.
Too bad we can't code logical-coherence into the system.
There are so many people here who claim to be "libertarians" and yet, they act as de facto AUTHORITARIANS.