"I'm in Virginia. In Virginia if you are caught as the cheater, the courts will crush you....In my opinion, cheaters deserve to be crushed [by the unfaithful, dishonest, and unethical state.]"
Yet, you're pro-liberty right?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
So you think that if someone is pro liberty, they are not allowed to assist others in getting retribution from those that have broken a contract, if the state is involved? The state is the "adjudicating official" in the contract between this husband and wife, that was by their choosing. The PI is only assisting the victim gather evidence of wrong doing.
For all practical purposes marriages are honestly a three party contract between two people, and the state, and all parties involved agree to these contractual obligations.
The no true scottsman mentality is a shitty way to go about advocating for personal liberty. Wouldn't that hard line approach be technically less liberty minded since you reject all those that choose to enter into voluntary contrats with people or groups you disagree with?
I mean personally I see liberty as the freedom to choose to do whatever you want as long as all parties involved consent. How do you see it?
(Pardon typos or spelling issues typing from phone will edit once i get home)
You think people should be able to break their contract with another person without consequences?
I would love to see the government replaced with a Rights Enforcement Agency. People would still be punished for being dishonest and breaking contracts though.
Do you think "liberty" means doing any damned thing you want to anyone you want for any reason? Breaking your word? Agreeing to a contract and then breaking it without any consequences is your idea of liberty?