No, you spent your vote power to vote on a share of the rewards. Someone voted against your vote because they didn't agree with you taking that much of the rewards, which was their choice. It's not about good faith or return on investment, it's about Curating. Curating involves marking things five stars and marking things no stars. Voting is a zero sum game, your Vote devalued every other vote on the platform, without anyone's "consent". Each time a whale votes with a hefty % they devalue everyone else's vote.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
The value of our vote is fluid until payout. You are implying that if I leave my waitress a $20 tip because I thought the service was good, you have a right to come take $10 of it because you thought the service was not that good? Now, if the markets tank and her $20 tip only buys her $10 worth of stuff tomorrow, that is not the same as taking part or all of my tip off the table.
It was a simple analogy... You WOULD take the tip off the table. Everyone in the restaurant got serviced equally, some of us were happy with it and some were not. Those who were happy left big tips, those who were not STOLE THE TIPS off the table. They could choose to NOT tip, but they take the tips off the table. And I just checked out your blog, you and I are pretty much on the same page about SO many things... I am done fighting with you over this. You can feel OK with taking my vote back, but I feel like you stole it when you do. Peace, out.