Thank you for sharing your views. Hypothetical question for you: If I give a friend $100 and you feel it is too much, do you have a moral or ethical right to intervene and take some of it away from my friend so that my gift is more in line with your sensibilities? What gives you the right to dictate what is reasonable or not for me or my friend?
While I recognize that the capacity to flag is there, what I am questioning is the moral and ethics behind using it the way anybody involved in this situation is using them. After all, a tool is just a tool. How we use that tool reflects the morality and ethics of the individual using the tool. Much like a hammer, they can be used to build houses, but also used to tear them down and kill people. It is not the hammer that is the issue, but rather how we use it!
I agree with you though; there is no proof of greed or the pool being drained causing harm to the community as a whole. I've only witnessed allegations and that is not proof.
I see what your saying, my response above on @taskmasters comment is kind of inline with this hypothetical. Really, why should we be able to decide how people vote. Whales get their say too, just because we disagree doesn't mean we are right when we do. Nice article good sir