Hey @anharismail ,
Thank you for the contribution. Nice work!
In my opinion it could be better if you make strokes thinner. Understandability and visibility level of the logo design could be increased.
Your contribution has been evaluated according to Utopian policies and guidelines, as well as a predefined set of questions pertaining to the category.
To view those questions and the relevant answers related to your post, click here.
Need help? Chat with us on Discord.
Thanks for your moderation and opinion. But, in my side, I make the the stroke bolder because I want to make it visible, especially on small sized.
Anyway @baranpirincal, why this contribution didn't listed on voting list? Is there something wrong?
I'm using this browser extension: https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/utopian/enodmgbbodkljcmenikaolnohjmlghcb
and it shows "This post has received a score of 0." here, which usually means a rejected submission.
However, looking at the score sheet's URL, it's actually "4-1-1-1-6-1-1-3-1-". Since the lower the better, the apparently-worst ones are:
I suppose the last one, 3, is not that bad, judging from the description. However, the first (4) and especially the second (6) could cause a automatic rejection. Just guessing though. I personally wouldn't consider a "new" or "unpopular" project to be a rejecting condition, but who knows..
If I look from the questionnaire, this contribution not the worse. It has get better 'score' than my other contributions that usually being voted. It make me feel confused.
Thank you for your review, @baranpirincal! Keep up the good work!