Sharing a video is sharing a video, you need to update your ideology and introduce reforms, like this excellent idea from markymark that will help user retention if its used before someone gets attack flagged.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Read my comment again.
Trying to receive votes from curators with content that is not theirs.
I don't post very often, but when I do, I purchase some Steem and spend it (promotion bots), if more people did this, the price of Steem would increase.
Creating "original content" and then cashing out your earnings, puts a downward pressure on the Steem price.
NO unfortunately the majority of curators are looking for a return on their vote and following the money! Get real please!
If you want more people to invest in Steem then collectively, we Steemian's need to stop doing stuff that is detrimental to investing!
Stop blaming bid bots for everything, they drive the creation & money flow of Steem (growth) and put an upward pressure on the Steem price!
Stop censoring / scaring away users indiscriminately @amnlive is a recent example.
Stop giving bid bot users a bad experience, by robbing them first with no capped losses and then finishing them off with indiscriminate flagging.
Yes, printing more liquid Steem totally increases price. /s
So according to you we should restrict the money supply (decrease growth) and just allow its use for the "worthy ones?" Lol 😀
Your words. Not mine. Lol
If I wish to share a video and then pump it with bid bots, that is perfectly fine, your comment states that is not the case.
Expect to get flagged, then.
In fact, you'll probably get flagged from @themarkymark too. Do as you wish.
You need to reform, why get offended and attack someone if they want to promote an excellent video that they have found?
Bid bot usage helps the Steemit economy.
I'm gonna pretend you have reading comprehension issues.
Most curators are looking for original work. Are you the type of guy that shares someone else's stuff and tag #artzone + bid bots?
This utility is a tool for curators to remind people that what they "shared" is not acceptable for the curators to vote on.
Let me guess, no flags? So, your bots are literally the classic scam of "give me a dollar, I'll give you two." I wonder why nobody invests in this place.
I don't post very often, but when I do, I purchase some Steem and spend it (promotion bots), if more people did this, the price of Steem would increase.
Creating "original content" and then cashing out your earnings, puts a downward pressure on the Steem price.
NO unfortunately the majority of curators are looking for a return on their vote and following the money! Get real please!
If you want more people to invest in Steem then collectively, we Steemian's need to stop doing stuff that is detrimental to investing!
The curators in this context include those involved in different initiatives such as @curie, @c-squared, etc.
Lol buying votes = better price? Better tell all their delegators to stop cashing out.
You’ll get better price if more people used @null instead of sending liquid money to bots for the owners and delegators to cash out.
@amnlive has recently decided that they would stop posting 20+ times a day and condense their news into less posts.
You have no idea what my stance on bot usage is, so don’t assume.
You have just showed me that you have no idea what you are talking about.