There are more ways. The first one is to utilize Utopian task requests, which means that the project owners / developers can submit they requests in Utopian instead of using just the issue tracker.
For the other cases, the moderation team will see existing projects and if they are found to be valuable and that the testers are good to be rewarded for their reports, the projects may be put down to the whitelist. The project name is written there if we can see that there is a public support of bug issue reports or that the project owner agrees with being written in the whitelist.
The decision may not have been announced in prior but we are going to do our best to maintain the list so that genuine testers may be rewarded for their work. Though, one should not depend on the rewards and pick the projects on that.
I know Utopians change the rules today because they want to throw out bad contributor because they are not good in english. How does that statement relate to today's changes.
Yeah, that is bug-hunting category
Exuse me
There are more ways. The first one is to utilize Utopian task requests, which means that the project owners / developers can submit they requests in Utopian instead of using just the issue tracker.
For the other cases, the moderation team will see existing projects and if they are found to be valuable and that the testers are good to be rewarded for their reports, the projects may be put down to the whitelist. The project name is written there if we can see that there is a public support of bug issue reports or that the project owner agrees with being written in the whitelist.
The decision may not have been announced in prior but we are going to do our best to maintain the list so that genuine testers may be rewarded for their work. Though, one should not depend on the rewards and pick the projects on that.
I know Utopians change the rules today because they want to throw out bad contributor because they are not good in english. How does that statement relate to today's changes.
I'm sorry, I probably did not understand the original question properly.