You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Translations ancap-ch/from-en into Indonesian - PR #2123

in #utopian-io6 years ago

@berniesanders.

This account's user is a moderator at Utopian.io. This account is cheating, the account is self-employed and all the translate contributions that are in utopian he do alone, while all contributions are done by others he rejects badly, without any knowledge and explanation that the results are wrong, and never explain what is wrong with the contribution. So, we can only ask for help to you, if you are willing. thanks.

Many have rebelled on the vote on this post.

Sort:  

Can anybody explain this behaviour and downvoting? If you have problems with the process of Utopian you should discuss it in the Discord server. Calling for downvoters is not a solution especially if many of the downvoters are users who intentionally abused the Utopian system.

It is enough to see the other comments and it is obvious that those people cannot behave.

Please speak here, prove the truth to the public, Discord will not solve anything.
It is impossible for a tiger to enter a lion's den, if necessary, complete it in this post. And tell @rooneey to reply to all these comments.

First of all, I do not understand why many of you are so upset since it was found out that lots of these people try to cheat the system and pretend that they know languages they do not know.

Anybody could join a project and work with the owners on new localization. It seems to me that you can't live with the thought that somebody else has more knowledge than you, which helped them to be trusted by the project owners. If you or anybody else have doubts about @rooneey 's capabilities of translating, you should contact the project owner and we can cooperate with them.

As far as I know, they are satisfied with rooneey's work and we do not see any reason to make additional moves to stop rooneey from his translation work.

If the reward is the only thing why any of you started but after rejections stopped working on a project, then I can say that such behaviour is not what we seek. You have still chance to prove us wrong.

really like you say, but think about it, 1000 words we translate, we translate more than 1000 words, there are 1100 there are 1200, is it just because one wrong word our work is rejected? let's say we are wrong words up to 100 words, we mean we are eligible to receive because there are still 1000 correct words. you need to know us in utopian work instead of begging, keep that in mind.

Bullshit again. In the hearing, the most votes are the ones who win. Automatically, the lowest sound will also fall into the abyss.

Well, I am also fed up with the supervisors and moderators in utopian. If the utopians do not take fair action, we can solve it in our own way. Please your sit at home and shake your legs.

moderator indonesia is too hungry with money ,, they are all not very smart english ,, they take reward for myself ,, i know very well moderator india ,, they are not very smart english ,, all moderator indonesian bitch money ,, no guidance to contributor indonesia ,, meraka take our quota ,,
Indonesian moderators too much of this contribution is so unfair, they are greedy
@espoem

@espoem you check post moderator indonesia ... as if this utopian-io for moderator only. see how much he has contributed. and always approve, while our contribution is not a moderator is often rejected

Moderator Indonesia does not think Indonesian people, and to contribute even we can not work because moderator work translation has no balance to project have no brain to others. It's like being a utopian project for moderators, when everyone can work. But the moderator forbids us to do utopian to take the project for him .. @espom

all the projects have been taken by the moderator, so the moderators do this project without professionals, please limit how many projects should be taken by the moderator, only to you we can complain the fate of the esteemed espoem.
@espoem

ne proof that he rejects the contributions of others.
So, if the contribution has been rejected, then the contribution can be translated by others. Well, Any contribution he rejects, he will take it for his own work. very cunning.

Screenshot_20180307_004912.jpg