+1 Good idea!
One problem with that implementation is that the person who started the chatroom/"post" would receive all the steem instead of it being shared. I think the previous on-chain chat for @dlive worked this way, which made sense for it to go to one person, but most group chats wouldn't work that way.
I wonder what @therealwolf thinks about this.
The reward on the chatroom post shouldn't be an issue, since the application could simply prevent it from beeing upvoted in the GUI.
I REALLY like the approach of the Mangosteem project.
Link: https://steemit.com/steem/@gokulnk/mangosteem-steem-powered-web-chat
In this app you could only upvote content in the chat itsself instead of the channel. I wonder why the project isn't online anymore - it had SO much potential, if you ask me!
If @therealwolf won't catch up and devolop for this usecase - I will anytime soon :)
wow awesome post or comment really tnx bro @roomservice
Please Stop - @mdfardushkhan100
You just said "awesome post" and in your your last 100 comments you used 43 phrases considered to be spam and you made this exact same comment 1 times. You've received 0 flags and you may see more on comments like these. These comments are the reason why your Steem Sincerity API classification scores are Spam: 55.20% and Bot: 4.60%
Please stop making comments like this and read the ways to avoid @pleasestop and earn the support of the community.
I hadn't heard of Mangosteem. Looks like the project is still alive but it has errors. The main JS file is still available:
http://alpha.mangosteem.chat/js/mangosteem.js?v1.9.1
I will look more into their approach. Thanks!