I read somewhere he's powering down 2 accounts, I confirmed one of them, that's all I know. Check his wallet and draw your own conclusions.
Edit: I'm not willing to speculate at this point, but he has enough already sitting there for a new Mercedes.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Must be buying new gifts for a certain someone. jk
Here is something to chew on, no joke. https://steemit.com/fiction/@etherpunk/a-short-essay-in-100-posts Maybe I should publish my videos this way; one frame at a time. Hmm, let's see, 25 FPS X 60 seconds X 10 minutes = 15,000 posts. Maybe I should switch to HD instead of 4K so I can shoot at 60 FPS, lol!
Oh great. The classic "water is wet" Kevin Wong.
He's up to #8 already so we can read the entire Shipost in about 10 days, lol.
And he'll say he's making a point.
This is why I don't vote for him. He puts other whales to shame.
Well I don't know about that. I followed a few others and one got exactly 52 up votes for every post and comment with slowly descending payouts for the day. Only to be repeated the next day of course. Others posted exactly 5 times a day, but with fewer and bigger up votes.
Naturally their point is rights to ROI unless you paid less for Steem than they did; then it's abuse....
All those guys talking about "ROI" like they are all some absolute authority. They aren't. Who are they in real life again?
Stacking coins is meaningless when an asset is losing value. True ROI in this system is people flocking in and wanting to be here. In other words, Steem becoming a name for decentralized social sphere.
What they are doing is cutting losses. This is why I chuckle when they present themselves as some sort of experts. It's really no different than the then emerging bourgeoise during the Industrial Revolution.
If they are really worried about abusers becoming bigger than we can handle, they would be flagging along.
They aren't.