Your contribution cannot be approved because it does not follow the Utopian Rules.
Your suggestion is considered as trivial because it does not add extensive value to enhance the steemit platform. Suggestions of value needs to be extensive with greater information and explanation for the project owner.
You are advised to always suggest things that will most probably have great impact on the project. Example of good contributions can be found here: https://utopian.io/utopian-io/@mattniblock/6bzrry-steemit-app-design-wireframes
You can contact us on Discord.
[utopian-moderator]
I respectfully disagree. This is not my first time in utopian and it is safe to say that utopian “rewards” have rather been disappointing considering the level of contribution everyone makes on the platform.
You, mentioning that my contribution is trivial is absolutely unjustified and to be quite frank, a little rude.
Because i do not see steemit stopping spamming bots from following steemit users and this is becoming a huge nuisance. Number of followers is significant to a person’s experience and blog quality on steemit and unfortunately due to huge spam / bot accounts, this criteria of measuring someone’s experience or quality of blog on steemit is not valid anymore.
Sometimes, solutions to the biggest problems are small. Huge amounts of bugs and errors are removed from a software just by adding a line of code or removing one. I would’t call those solutions trivial.
I dont contribute towards utopian for rewards. If i wanted to, i can cleverly post 3 contributions a week by recommending suggestions in open source programs by merely adding / editing few lines in the code (which i know alot of people are doing and skimming rewards from utopian).
If you consider this contribution as trivial then you could have approved this contribution with a minimum reward to address your concern of me not making a “huge” post on it.
This contribution, by the way, adds almost the same amount of value (if not more) to the platform in comparsion to you suggesting a “collage” on steepshot by adding a collage button on right top corner of steepshot page. No matter how long you have tried to make it by explaining to the “people of social media” that what a collage is, still the contribution was about just one line and that is to add “collage” on steepshot..
Anyways, this is unbecoming of a utopian moderator to tell someone that their contribution is trivial and cannot be accepted because it wasn’t lengthy to read.
Cheers. I would be contacting @elear on discord to clear this thing out because as per my understanding as an engineer and as a steemit user, i would never rule out someone’s idea just because they did not make a 3 page post about it and rather successfully explained the idea on 1 page.
@jbn, thank you for your long explanation. We try our best to review each contribution and put much thought and care into each one when we do the review. If you feel this is not a fair review, you can always contact my supervisor on discord. Presently @knowledges is the suggestion supervisor. If I had been too hard on the review, I apologise. My supervisor with more experience can give you further help here.
Well.. @knowledges has failed to consider this “dead accounts / spam bot accounts” issue even an issue so we didn’t get to the part where the solution is discussed.. congratulations, you retain..