In an unexpected move against non-vaccinated children, the Johns Hopkins All Children’s Hospital in St. Petersburg, Florida is going to deny medical services to children who aren't vaccinated. They have sent letters to parents of children who are not vaccinated or are not following the "official" vaccination schedule to tell them their child will not be allowed to receive medical services at their hospital:
... the JHACH Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine clinic will no longer accept patients who are unvaccinated, on an an alternative vaccine schedule or those with religious exceptions from the Florida Department of health.
Source
Can you believe this shit? It's a shock to actually see, but it wasn't unexpected honestly. This is bound to happen more and more as the pro-vaccine authoritarian mindset takes hold in society.
The letter was posted on Dr. Robert J. Rowen's facebook page, to which he commented:
The photo I am posting demonstrates the next phase of the systematic destruction of your health care rights emanating from the vaccine industry.I admit this is frightening. A prestigious institution has announced that it will deny care to those children who are unvaccinated.
We have discussed this coming draconian event on this page and I believe it will be an infectious wave that will hit most other pediatric medical centers.
Please note that it does address religious beliefs, and essentially will be ignoring those beliefs.
Is there anything you can do about this?
Perhaps. Please see the video below.
The Department of Health and Human Services has established an office to assist those whose civil rights are violated in the “health” industry.
Your religion is protected by the First Amendment.
If Hopkins is getting any kind of reimbursement from the government, the institution could be held accountable for participating in a civil rights violation according to the people who forwarded me this information.
HHS Office for Civil Rights: Here to Serve You
The blind adherence to mandatory vaccinations is imposing vaccines to the point of denying medical access if you choose not to have your child vaccinated for all the vaccines the medical establishment commands they must have. This is tyranny. They are denying medical access because you choose to not do what they want you to do.
This isn't like saying don't hit the doctor or you will be denied medical access, or other reasonable things. This is flat out denying medical access because you don't comply with the demands for vaccination!
Children need medical care at times. Doctors are supposed to be there to help. Yet, now just because you don't want to give your child the 16 shots by age X, or 30 shots by age Y, you won't be allowed to bring your child to the doctor at this hospital.
It won't be long before this policy is adopted at more and more hospitals, and the authoritarian plague in the medical establishment becomes complete in order to force vaccination onto every child in America. Vaccines have risks, yet they don't ever want to talk about that. So many blindly think all vaccines are 100% safe, all the time, for everyone. They don't see the reality of vaccine injuries, and some do yet don't care. They are not allowed to discriminate and refuse medical access like this.
Is denying medical access morally right? Is this denial of medical access a form of child abuse? Is forcing potential injury onto a child abuse as well?
I think so. What do you think?
Thank you for your time and attention. Peace.
If you appreciate and value the content, please consider: Upvoting, Sharing or Reblogging below.
me for more content to come!
My goal is to share knowledge, truth and moral understanding in order to help change the world for the better. If you appreciate and value what I do, please consider supporting me as a Steem Witness by voting for me at the bottom of the Witness page.
I have said this regarding the social network bans we see so much of. Perhaps through free market principals we shall see networks of doctors who see a growing untapped market of those being denied service and will form their own networks that cater to them.
Yeah, maybe, nut not likely, as the AMA controls a lot, like licenses, and even punishes doctors who, like at least one in California who exempted some patients, even for valid medical reasons. He got placed of probation.
ABSOLUTELY UNBELIEVABLE!
This sorry excuse for a NWO puppet physician Rachel Dawkins should have her license revoked.
I hope more people are putting the heat on this bitch...
Thanks for posting @krnel, you always find the most fascinating (and relevant) news bits.
Yeah, the global control is ramping up the more we advance in years :/ You're welcome ;)
The First Amendment doesn't apply here. The relevant part of the First Amendment reads:
Congress didn't pass a law saying people couldn't exercise religion. The First Amendment doesn't apply private institutions. It wouldn't violate the First Amendment, for example, if you decided to say "sorry, no Christians allowed here".
There is however legislation that prevents religious discrimination by private entities: the Human Rights Act of 1964. This prevents discrimination on religion grounds. However, what John Hopkins is doing is not discrimination. They aren't factoring in religion when deciding who gets to be a patient. It would be illegal for them to say that Christians can't be a patient, for example.
Additionally, it's not as though they hate religions apposed to vaccines. They have legitimate reasons to only treat vaccinated patients: more revenue, less workload (it's easier to manage a hospital if you don't have to deal with each individual's vaccine preferences, image (supporting anti-vaxxers might make them look bad), and they might beleive that vaccines reduce the amount of care they need to provide, due to preventing diseases (you may disagree with that, but as long as the hospital beleives that, the point is valid).
Maybe it violates some other law, or moral view, but it's not a religious legal violation.
Their discriminating on what someone doesn't do: vaccinate. The religious argument is why some ppl don't vaccine, is all. Hence, not accepting " those with religious exceptions" is a discrimination to refuse service for not doing something because your religious reasons don't accept it.
Wow. Bad news, first amendment?
Medice, cura te ipsum.
Well thats just ridiculous... smh. I got no words for this one.
LOL. Anti-gubermit libertarians demanding HHS protect their "rights" from private medical organization? Whatever happened to "rights" of private businesses to operate without gubermit interference? Are you arguing that hospitals and physicians be under compulsory obligation to render all non-emergency medical services? Hmm . . . that seems only a small step away from the "evil medicare for all" policies the "progressives" demand.
This is the difference between a liberty right and a claim right: if you prefer a negative vs positive human right. A liberty right is that one should be left alone, a claim right is an obligation upon other people. In the USA it's pretty difficult politically to insist on claim rights. The USA does have protected-classes and they have some claim rights, but being unvacinatted is not a protected class (last time I checked).
The USA is a sociopolitical organization established by and for the mercantile and financial class. Beyond mercantile contractual obligations, the sociocultural matrix has little to no concepts regarding community, loyalty, or duty. Even their so-called Christian religion is nothing but mercantile contract between peers, writ large into metaphysical sphere, in which worshippers discuss "rights" due them by their supposed creator, according to some ancient legal contract.
When success is perceived to be dependent solely upon individual merit, individual effort, individual creativity, what do the "self-made" men owe towards their neighbors, community, or society? The vacuum of power left by rebelling against their betters and their rightful sovereign in their colonial insurrection was filled by smugglers, merchants, and rentiers. In this social organization, greatest virtue of government is being ineffective and absent, in order that the smugglers and rentiers could continue running their crimminal enterprise unmolested. Claims right is as foreign a concept as responsibility or vocation.
Curated for #informationwar (by @wakeupnd)
Our purpose is to encourage posts discussing Information War, Propaganda, Disinformation and other false narratives. We currently have over 7,500 Steem Power and 20+ people following the curation trail to support our mission.
Join our discord and chat with 250+ fellow Informationwar Activists.
Join our brand new reddit! and start sharing your Steemit posts directly to The_IW, via the share button on your Steemit post!!!
Connect with fellow Informationwar writers in our Roll Call! InformationWar - Leadership/Contributing Writers/Supporters: Roll Call
Ways you can help the @informationwar
Hi @krnel!
Your post was upvoted by @steem-ua, new Steem dApp, using UserAuthority for algorithmic post curation!
Your UA account score is currently 7.267 which ranks you at #65 across all Steem accounts.
Your rank has not changed in the last three days.
In our last Algorithmic Curation Round, consisting of 251 contributions, your post is ranked at #21.
Evaluation of your UA score:
Feel free to join our @steem-ua Discord server