Title:
Annotation:
This analytical report investigates allegations of voter fraud in the recent presidential election, where Vladimir Putin secured a significant portion of the votes. Utilizing mathematician Sergei Shpilkin's methodology, the report estimates the extent of fraudulent votes and highlights concerns regarding electoral integrity in Russia. Insights derived from data analysis shed light on the prevalence of ballot stuffing and its implications for the electoral process.
Rewrite:
Explore the claims of voter fraud surrounding Vladimir Putin's victory in the recent presidential election through a detailed analysis. Leveraging Sergei Shpilkin's mathematical approach, this report delves into the alleged manipulation of election results, revealing concerning discrepancies in the voting data. The findings underscore the need for transparency and accountability in electoral practices.
Hashtags: #VoterFraud #PutinElection #ElectoralIntegrity #DataAnalysis #Transparency #Accountability
Conclusion:
The findings of this analysis raise significant questions about the integrity of the electoral process in Russia, particularly regarding the extent of voter fraud. The utilization of statistical methods highlights discrepancies that warrant further scrutiny and underscores the importance of safeguarding democratic principles in elections.
Keywords: Voter Fraud, Electoral Integrity, Vladimir Putin, Sergei Shpilkin, Data Analysis, Electoral Transparency
Links: (N/A)
About half of the votes for Vladimir Putin in the presidential election were thrown in, Nova-Europe calculations show.
Using the method of mathematician Sergei Shpilkin, we estimated the share of "anomalous" votes in the last election. We used data based on the results of processing 97% of the CEC protocols collected by the Nevybory channel.
Excluding electronic voting, 74.5 million voters took part in the elections. 64.7 million of them, according to the CEC, voted for Putin.
It follows from our analysis that Putin received at least 31.6 million votes through fraud, meaning that about half of the votes for him were thrown in.
This is a record level of voter fraud in a Russian presidential election. There was so much falsification that it is almost impossible to identify the range of "honest" votes using statistical methods.
The Shpilkin method reveals how many votes were "added" to the winner through ballot stuffing and rewriting of the final protocols. It does this by comparing the distribution of votes for different candidates with the turnout at each polling station.
If the election was fair, the distribution of votes for the leading candidate and all the other candidates should be identical, i.e. they should differ only in absolute value due to the different number of votes, not in form. However, a throw-in for one of the candidates affects the distribution: it increases both the turnout and the result.
We will provide more details on the assessment of ballot box stuffing in our upcoming publications.
About half of the votes for Vladimir Putin in the presidential election were thrown in, Nova-Europe calculations show. - Infosec.Pub
https://infosec.pub/post/9894257
Congratulations @osint1337! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain And have been rewarded with New badge(s)
Your next target is to reach 50 upvotes.
You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOP