It would be the same as copying someone's writing and not correctly citing it, marking it down and pretending to be the author of it = plagiarism. Would be considered deception and fraud.
Not clearly mentioning that the content was copied from someone else, either from another human or from an AI prompt, is a fraud.
Generally, by default, any reader considers that the content they are reading was created by a human, and when commenting and communicating, they presume that they speak to a human.
Readers generally feel deceived and cheated when they find out that the response or post was generated by AI without telling them.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Hi @hivewatchers,
Thanks for the response and clarification. I apologize for not correctly citing and giving source credit to AI. Could you kindly further clarify Hive Watcher's policy that if it is OK to publish AI generated content on Hive Blockchain, if the author cites and give source credit, with a statement like the following as part of the content:
"This is an AI generated content with human idea and feedback pre generation and review and editing post generation. Comments will be viewed by human and responses to comments will posted by human.
Yes, the disclaimer sounds good, but I would also clearly mention AI in the title of the post and decline rewards on posts generated by AI.