Hey, just thought I'd check in and ask what you thought about this:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-02-16/u-s-charges-13-russians-3-companies-for-hacking-election
Which basically disproves your entire website and best I can tell your life work, and that of this 'adam carter'(if he exists, search of disobedient media doesn't return any hits on his articles and if you click the symbol that represents his picture nothing happens anymore....):
https://archive.fo/AD6sH
https://archive.fo/J13yW
https://archive.fo/1Y8R0
https://archive.fo/E6wJZ
Considering your work with suzie who has to seek asylum in russia for unspecified/unclear reasons, this is really really bad for your website.
I'll give you a chance to respond, because I want to post it on my blog for laughs. My last blog post by the way derived all of this without the extremely proven facts that russians interfered in the election, and ham-handedly, incompetently, obviously.
I wonder, how did your journalistic skills miss that? Are you going to double down and now try to demonstrate these indictments are all wrong and you have the real story?
Do tell, Im all ears.