LOL, stu is disabled, dormant and at position #333. That's a "sensible" use of your vote. Your solo's have ALREADY quit.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
LOL, stu is disabled, dormant and at position #333. That's a "sensible" use of your vote. Your solo's have ALREADY quit.
omg ... is this even real? Surely somebody's just trying to get a laugh here? Well, it worked.
On the outside chance that it is serious, I'm confused as to why this would be a reason to not vote witness teams. Nothing has gone wrong with the witness. Still holding strong. No trouble on the horizon. One of the partners just had other things she wanted to do that conflicted. How is that problematic? I don't see it. Oh, well.
@rhondak : The short answer, from the link posted above, for not wanting team witnesses is ...
and
Hope that clarifies it for you.
Nope. Doesn't clarify why you'd give an inactive witness/user your proxy. And that lack of judgment pretty much negates any other argument you try to make. Kinda tells me I'm just listening to the wind blow.
Guess you may have missed that Stuw's departure was not know to me, @rhondak. A message notice that one's witness has gone inactive and release of their votes might be good mod for the next fork. 👍
Stew seemed a natural voice of discontent. 😎
And Stew has apparently left the platform. At least he is no longer a witness. But if voting for dead witnesses is your thing, then ok.
This is the first time hearing of dear Stew's departure. Thanks for the heads up.
Yeah, might want to do a little investigation into who you cast (or don't cast) those votes for. Just some friendly advice.
Thanks for the clarification.