You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Witness consensus status to fix the actual steem’s economic flows (ENG)

Wow, what an interesting table! Thanks for your efforts in compiling the information and for providing us with so much transparency.

So the n^1 rewards curve got basically approved by all witnesses, for instance. Does that mean that it's automatically going to be part of the next hardfork?

Sort:  

That's what we already have.

Ah, then I misunderstood the line This is the list of change proposals.
Then change means keeping what we have in this specific case, got it.

yes, @tcpolymath is correct. So basically it means most of the witnesses didn't want to change to a superlinear reward based on stake: the preference was to stay "as-is" and change other rules/parameters.

Thanks for clarifying this! I was reading the line This is the list of change proposals and thought that all following points included changes to the current system.

Yes, it's probably worth clarifying that point in the post itself (@cervantes).

Good point. I‘ll adapt.

Nice, thank you :-)