Here's something, the absence of visible development is not necessarily even the indication of such an absence. It's my spin on "the absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence". If you couldn't decypher the other one: it does not matter if one person tries to censor others from selling their coins, or a whole "community", it's not the right thing, and the means never justify the ends.
Posted using Partiko Android
Well I am not saying restrictions be put on their funds. That I agree is not right. But just like with any investment such as stocks u have a vote. With dpos u don't. It's more of a government structure and we know how much money governments love to blow.
Posted using Partiko Android
Really puzzles me how u go through life with such the aditude lol good luck with that enjoy your weekend.
Posted using Partiko Android
Nah just a Miss understanding on ur part which is very common online. Restricting them would mean reduced funds the company earns because the community voted on it as a change. Steems price will struggle if there is needless spending and the community should be able to vote more and have direction.
Steemit is steem they are suppose to do the development work. They haven't been and still lack to make much movement. They spend time on dumb updates instead of listening to the community as they should since each person here is in essence a stock holder in the company.
But I can see from ur other posts u just like to bitch and moan so after this post u will no longer be a waste of my time.
Posted using Partiko Android