It's an appeal to common definitions, those things which you check in on the door of a debate. You posit, but don't show, which I guess is fine because I do not have the inclination to school you on basics, just to highlight your lack of them.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I have given you a model, you have given me no counter to disprove that model, just remarks.
Why doesn't my model make logical sense?
Can you give me any historical precedent that doesn't follow the path of further centralization by an authority?
(irrelevant of the label attached to the name of the said authority?)
I know of none, and I've been studying history for decades.
Or do you claim that all historical precedent has no bearing, and is irrelevant information on which to structure a model?
Hey! you TWO.
Even Krapital-ism & DEMOcrazy. Same SHIT - Different Seman-ticks.
¡True Education First! that's key!! "I am an old Venezuelan currently 'living in Vzla'"
.....you don't have to convince me! lolol
Haha. Yeah I know!! ;)
My response was more directed to @personz. ...Obvious-ly. 😈