I don't know a whole lot about the occult connections but I definitely do think that it was an "inside job" in some way or another. What turned it around for me was when my friend who is a structural engineer told me that he is part of a group of 10 thousand engineers around the world who agree that the building should not have fell because of the plane strikes and that it should not have collapsed the way it did (if it was going to collapse). He basically said that it just doesnt make sense structurally. I'm sure people will be talking about the event and the controversy surrounding it for decades if not hundreds of years.
Posted using Partiko Android
I'm aware of that group and from what I've seen on the other side is that it looks like they make some claims that are hotly debated by the official story defenders and they it seems from what I saw sort of stuffed their member list and many of the people are not structual engineers and a few of the main speakers are a bit "out there" so to speak. But, I still resonate with their message more in general than I do the official story defenders. It does seem odd what happened there in many ways and I think there's a coverup. It doesn't mean the government did it, but I do think there is a lot being covered up and it's likely that some elements of the government were involved.
And yes I agree, people will probably be talking about it for a long time like they still do with JFK's assassination and other issues in history.
That's interesting. I didnt know that about the list being padded and all of that. That's good to know.
Posted using Partiko Android