I dunno that I agree 'we are @haejin and @haejin is us' is true, but you are correct that the witnesses and Stinc can fix whatever is perceived to be the problem, but only by eschewing the degree to which they themselves drain rewards.
I do see @haejin as demonstrating quite obviously the problems with extant code. Whether this is simply his business plan, or is politically motivated I cannot say.
His actions do hand the ball to Stinc and the witnesses. It's their move. Their move has been to do nothing. That's informative as to their purpose.
Thanks!