There's no momentary reward system for posting anything and system of curation. On other platforms.
That isn't factually correct, as every social media platform has some curative mechanism, even if only censoring opinions they don't like, and means of rewarding at least some content. However it isn't responsive to my point, which is that memes are a different form of content are uniquely not attributable by common usage.
I do not assert that enables posters to claim they created memes they repost, nor fail to specifically point out someone else created them, nor be relieved of the obligation to actually provide OC.
I do assert that those are the necessary requirements to be considered OC and monetized on Hive.
I am more concerned today with the delegation for upvotes schemes and curation schemes that wholly exclude authors (HBDfunder comments, for example), that between them comprise ~60 - 80% of rewards paid out today, and the recently stated intention to improve AI bots on Hive, which is an existential threat to the platform. Replacing human society with bots is clearly contradictory to the purpose of Hive for anyone except those with the compute to run bots that can capture more rewards from the pool than people, and will, if allowed, eventually capture all of them.
I expect your remit to include these far more substantial threats to Hive, particularly more harmful than meme posters. They're also more difficult and problematic to suppress. You need some kind of oracle to establish a particular account represents an unique human being, so socks and botnets don't completely eradicate Hive's purpose as social media and utility to human beings as anything but a token source they have automated means of mining.
That is, if you have the purpose of preventing harm to the platform from scams that wrongfully extract rewards. Is that how you define your remit and the purpose for which you are paid?
That isn't factually correct, as every social media platform has some curative mechanism, even if only censoring opinions they don't like, and means of rewarding at least some content. However it isn't responsive to my point, which is that memes are a different form of content are uniquely not attributable by common usage.
I do not assert that enables posters to claim they created memes they repost, nor fail to specifically point out someone else created them, nor be relieved of the obligation to actually provide OC.
I do assert that those are the necessary requirements to be considered OC and monetized on Hive.
I am more concerned today with the delegation for upvotes schemes and curation schemes that wholly exclude authors (HBDfunder comments, for example), that between them comprise ~60 - 80% of rewards paid out today, and the recently stated intention to improve AI bots on Hive, which is an existential threat to the platform. Replacing human society with bots is clearly contradictory to the purpose of Hive for anyone except those with the compute to run bots that can capture more rewards from the pool than people, and will, if allowed, eventually capture all of them.
I expect your remit to include these far more substantial threats to Hive, particularly more harmful than meme posters. They're also more difficult and problematic to suppress. You need some kind of oracle to establish a particular account represents an unique human being, so socks and botnets don't completely eradicate Hive's purpose as social media and utility to human beings as anything but a token source they have automated means of mining.
That is, if you have the purpose of preventing harm to the platform from scams that wrongfully extract rewards. Is that how you define your remit and the purpose for which you are paid?
"content are uniquely not attributable by common usage"
It doesn't matter. Like I already explained. Not the author? Then state it.