"I simply despise spread of dangerous pseudoscience and cognitive imbecility..."
So, your own person then.
Perhaps you'll sort for me which position on masks is pseudoscience and which is actual science, since your icons of policy have both claimed they are not useful, and now mandate them.
Either way, it is they - and you - that have promoted pseudoscience.
A global technocracy is being imposed on the world. You defend this tyranny with your flags and rants.
You censor and claim it is support for free speech. You promote scientism and claim to support science. You support global lockdowns and claim it is freedom. Lockdowns are what prisons do when prisoners get unruly. Social isolation is torture. Suppression of speech is censorship. You are so confused you do not realize you oppose yourself, and your hate is actually for yourself.
In a couple months you're going to be facing forced DNA altering injection at the point of a gun. You will not be able to be confused about whether that is tyranny or not, and then you'll regret opposing freedom of speech - because it could have helped you to prevent the despotism oppressing you.
Your freedom is dependent on the freedom of others. Your stake will not protect you when your neighbors don't. Protect them that disagree with you, or have no one to protect you when you need protecting.
When you oppose the free speech of others, you crush your own.
It is far more difficult to convince someone they've been fooled than to fool them. I paraphrase Mark Twain, but speak from my own experience, because I have been fooled by fake science regarding SARS-CoV-2 this year. It was very difficult for me to accept that the Lancet misled me, because I have had great confidence in the peer review process.
I hope dispelling the disinfo you have been misled by is easier for you than it has been for me.
Here is the truth about the pandemic justifying global lockdown, destruction of the economy, and social isolation afflicting free people globally today:
It's lies, and terrorism enabling the global imposition of technocratic tyranny.
I would prefer you remain free, but unless you join with others revealing the lies and terrorist propaganda, you will not realize your danger until it's too late. You, more than anyone else, will have delivered yourself into the hands of your enemies.
"because I have been fooled by fake science regarding SARS-CoV-2 this year. It was very difficult for me to accept that the Lancet misled me, because I have had great confidence in the peer review process"
Naaaaah. Nope!
Clearly you do not understand science and don't understand the basics of it's concepts such as peer review (evidently you are also scientifically illiterate)
If you refer to Surgisphere (fake science research company) with it's fake non peer-reviewed "research", the whole reason why the research was rejected is exactly BECAUSE OF SCIENTIFIC PEER REVIEW!
https://theconversation.com/retractions-and-controversies-over-coronavirus-research-show-that-the-process-of-science-is-working-as-it-should-140326
About the rest in your comment. This is my response:
This supply is probably not gonna last long for you considering how many hats you make each day.
Denial is a coping mechanism for folks incompetent to rationally grasp reality. If you then pile on unrelated blather that helps to keep you distracted from the objectionable reality.
You do that well.
Using logical fallacy by trying to look smart with use of complex langauge will not make your bullshit factual and scientifically accurate.
Here is a good introduction to science for you from someone I know:
https://www.youtube.com/user/ScienceLiteracy/videos
Failing to address points made in conversation and simply projecting your own scientism prevents actual conversation.
Go ahead and discuss this with the voices in your head, since you're not involving me and what I have said in any way whatsoever.
"Failing to address points made in conversation and simply projecting your own scientism prevents actual conversation.
Go ahead and discuss this with the voices in your head, since you're not involving me and what I have said in any way whatsoever"
Logical fallacy. You don't make any sense. You bumped into conversation with some pointless essay enforcing some subject that you require to respond to. I have no obligation to address to some subjects that you have brought, especially because I consider it scientifically illiterate nonsense. On the other hand, you should address the topic in the conversation that was started before you bumped in.
I addressed one point in your conversation about Lancet proving that you have no clue what you are talking about and do not understand science as you do not even understand what peer review is. That's about enough.
This conversation ends here as it is cognitively unstimulating for me. I already know how it will continue to if I reply more. You will just project more and more logical fallacies.
What does that even mean?
Do enjoy the entirely private meaning of your words. No one else can, because no one else can understand what they mean, strung together seemingly arbitrarily. Perhaps someday you'll understand what logical fallacy means, rather than just throwing it around because you think it sounds cool.