You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Will We See a New Version of 1933's Executive Order 6102?

in #anarchy7 years ago (edited)

I never said moral aren't subjective.
I never said 927 persons didn't owned half of Bitcoin in fact I knew it looked something like that.

Your statement saying 80% of Bitcoins are owned by 5 miners was blatantly erroneous yet every time I pointed out a false statement you made you never acknowledge it.

Can I asked you why do you live? Do you love life? Do you have any goal in life and aspirations? What are your biggest aspirations?

Sort:  

I never said moral aren't subjective.

Well, you did try to say that first was illegitimate and then immoral. You sure as hell implied that there was something "wrong". if you understood that it was subjective you wouldn't make the statement. You rather didn't know how to answer and decide to salvage the say by "hey I didn't say it wasn't".

I never said 927 persons didn't owned half of Bitcoin in fact I knew it looked something like that.

Yes you chose to attack the actions of the government when the crypto world is plagued by the same exact type of market?

Your statement saying 80% of Bitcoins are owned by 5 miners was blatantly erroneous yet every time I pointed out a false statement you made you never acknowledge it.

You have a reputation for being intellectually dishonest so here is my exact words again. I warned you to be extra careful when you debate me.

80% of Bitcoin is controlled by 5 miners in China. And it is true. They do. Just pay attention how the whole market hangs from their wishes in the days before August 1st.

Can I asked you why do you live? Do you love life? Do you have any goal in life and aspirations? What are your biggest aspirations?

irrelevant. Again. Trying to salvage your position by using bullshit tricks you learned from your bullshit books :)

not gonna work on me pal.

Forcing people to do stuff against their will is wrong. I sure did implied that current governments are morally wrong. It sure is subjective.

If you think I'm dishonest can I ask you why you are interacting with me? What is your purpose of interacting with me?

I'll stop replying because I have come to the subjective conclusion that you are dishonest or delusional.

I expect you'll say something like you won, I can't take it, I can't debate you, you're smarter, I can't debate you cause you're right, I'm full of shit but that's not the case.

It is my hope people can understand and see the situation for what it is.

Forcing people to do stuff against their will is wrong. I sure did implied that current governments are morally wrong. It sure is subjective.

Nobody is forcing anyone. Much like Steemit there is a system in place. If you don't like it. leave.

If you think I'm dishonest can I ask you why you are interacting with me? What is your purpose of interacting with me?

I am allergic to bullshit if you have noticed. Nothing personal.

I'll stop replying because I have come to the subjective conclusion that you are dishonest or delusional.

Sure, turn it on me now.

It is my hope people can understand and see the situation for what it is.

and that's exactly your problem. You care about what other people think. Check my posts from day 1. I don't give a shit what other people think and surely as hell I don't sound like a cheesy repackaged advertisement that is shilled from a whale.