Sure, call the guy who tries to argument and discuss a situation a tyrant, and move on to try to public shame him, mostly because he have a different opinion.
This is not a tyrant act right?
Sorry, but you just proved my point.
You are just declaring that you will use your influence power to harm someone else that disagree with you.
But that is not tyranny right? Because you have the "moral high ground" right?
See, when a tyrant can't provide solid arguments to prove his point, threats and the use of force/slash power is what they resort to.
Not calling you a tyrant per se, but again, you just proved my point that you don't have to be a tyrant to do tyranny acts.
LOL
Not agreeing with you is not oppressing you. Not supporting you is not oppressing you. You are the Golden Child. You have never been beaten in the street for refusing to obey. You have never been locked in a cage by guys with guns.
Opposing your viewpoint of entitlement to my stuff is my duty to my sons.
You have no right to anything of mine. You never will.
Doing without it is not remotely comparable to actual oppression and tyranny, and your comparisons are the best proof of your error.