Agree!! all bidbots are just spammer, can't understand why they sell votes and take curation rewards also !!? if someone sells his vote the curation rewards must go to the author! a vote seller isn't a curator!
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
You brought up an interesting point which proves that bidbots owners are solely looking for profit (excluding those who delegated their own SP to their own bidbots). To be straightforward, I am sure that bot owners work so hard to keep up the quality but simply as a human, they cannot do it without poisoning the environment, the complain on the trending page is the best example.
People are rarely coming on trending without using bots and that definitely shows the current state of steemit.
yes, as steem blockchain is a proof of brain, authors put time and brain to create content, but no one can get rewarded by the blockchain itself, must someone to upvote this content (curators), and needs a curator whit a lot of steem power to get value !! so curators with a lot of steem power looking just for profit by delegating to bidbots and vote sellers systèmes!!!
i think that steem will lose the attractivity whit time if we can't find a solution for :
1- curation value based on steem power
2- bid bots
3- bid bots curation rewards
My idea :
1-community must elect curators (vote systèm like witness), a curator must read and evaluate articles daily and upvote the good ones and downvote bad content, good curators must get vote and calcification and reputation from the community...
2- bid bots must guarantee 25 % profit for Buyers
3- bid bots can't take curation