If you're looking for decentralized Btrash is not where it's at. Btrash is Roger Ver and Roger Ver is Btrash. In the short term they have the better option, but once lighting network becomes mainstream there is no point for Bcash.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I guess I don’t understand calling something “trash” that has a greater functionality—as per it’s purported usage goal—than what is being argued to be superior.
It has bigger blocks so what? Last i saw bitcoin transaction speeds were quicker and cheaper a few weeks ago.
In sat/byte BTC was cheaper the last week, in USD/transaction it wasn't. ATM Bcash is indeed cheaper in dollars, but when the market price was even Bcash would be more expensive. So it is only cheaper because the network has less value.
When has a BCH transaction cost been more than BTC when a comparable volume is being transacted. Can you give me hard data?
http://fork.lol
The last 4 days ruined it, but there are periods that BTC is cheaper in sat/byte, but mostly is about even. Since this is the selling point of BCH and BTC does every other thing better I think it is fair to say that the marketing campaign of BCH is a fad
Haha. You can say that again. Show me a month where the fees were less than BCH.
except for the spikes now and then they are almost even. Bcash sacrificed centralisation, security, 2nd layers and network effect to be as expensive as BTC? Who is the one who should say 'haha? BTW, Lightning is a satoshi per transaction and instant, Bcash is extremely expensive and slow!
BTW, if I would use Roger his market strategy I would have cut off the last 4 days like he did with the Bitcoin dominance chart in his presentation.
It has smaller blocks because nobody is using it, they use not even 0.2% of the capacity, is Roger going to bring it to 0.3 by paying some Japanese merchants to use it? LOL.
@michiel, your tone is kinda ridiculous, bro. Let's have a big boys conversation. I answered and thanked you above for your info. Cheers. I'm talking with @gniksivart now. May the market be the judge and the best coin win. No need to get undies in a wad.
This is not a conversation with @gniksivart, this is a public conversation since it will be read by many and I feel free to mix in. I agree that the best coin should win decided by the market, but for the market to decide facts have to be given.
This is a conversation between @gniksivart and I, and of course you are free to jump in, as you have already several times on this post, which makes your case seem a bit desperate. Regardless, I’m glad to look at the info you’ve presented.
Really? What about transaction costs? Can you source that? I’m open to all facts/stats.