I downvoted this down to ~$40. I personally wouldn't have zeroed it out, but it was definitely over-rewarded when I called for reinforcements.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I downvoted this down to ~$40. I personally wouldn't have zeroed it out, but it was definitely over-rewarded when I called for reinforcements.
There was another post that we missed similar to this so I guess it's even now, but in general also another account connected to @dbroze bringing close to 0 value or traffic/engagement to Hive.
True.
I think this comment has been overvalued. Do you think I should downvote it?
I'm trying to understand why we are downvoting content that is not spam or plagiarized.
Feel free to power up some Hive and counter our downvotes if you think this deserves more rewards. Until then, this post will remain at zero.
hahaha good one.
I am an account holder who works her butt off, but earns very little. My 100% upvote, even if I powered up everything I have, would not put a tiny dent into your downvote trail.
You think an interview with Austin-Fitts is of zero value? Why? It think this interview is very interesting.
It's just an autovoted link taking users outside of hive, mate.
Ah! OK, I understand that. Thank you for answering politely.
I'm trying to understand this downvoting business better.
You did it because it had earned too much, in your valuation? What was its value when you brought it down to $40? At $40, was it still overvalued?
I see more and more accounts that are churning out what is essentially spam, yet making $70 or more a pop. This is not one of those.