That's Ok. Nothing for sorry.
So let me ask something...
I'd read the post that you published on Abr/07 entitled Social Money for enemies. My question is...
Do you believe that that post explains completely the sense of "Social Money for enemies"?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
No, it's not nearly good enough.
In fact, my positions on a lot of the ideas expressed in that article have changed.
I no longer think that it's possible or desirable to have a single contiguous community that spans all categories.
I explored this idea a little bit in "going massively multichain" but it's fair to say that I'm living it with https://blurt.world.
Regarding that you had changed your ideias. Do you believe that the main-ideia that made you work on Blurt ideia had changed also or the concept "Social Money for Enemies" is not do same as well?