When the CDC Makes a Narrative-Confirming Study that Contradicts Other Studies From Around the World

in #cdcstudy3 years ago

The CDC recently published a study that contradicts other studies about how effective the COVID-19 shots are at re-infection compared to unvaxxed who've been previously infected.

This is the punchline claimed:

FC4wPa-WYAoks2l.jpg

As Kim Iversen put it on Twitter:

Funny how it’s ONLY the United States who ends up with stats like this which no other country can replicate. Reminds me of when the world was seeing mass breakthroughs and the CDC was still claiming it was only 1%.

Isn't that funny though?

Israel can do a larger study, meaning a larger sample of people, and it makes it more significant scientifically, and find the opposite. Other countries have also done studies that come to the same conclusion.

What conclusion: the opposite of what the CDC says, that the unvaxxed with prior infection have a better immunity and ability to fight off alleged COVID-19 illness.

The Brownstone Institute's DIrector, Martin Kulldorff, went into both to show how the Israeli study is more reliable for it's conclusions: A Review and Autopsy of Two COVID Immunity Studies. Martin is an epidemiologist and biostatistician specializing in infectious disease outbreaks and vaccine safety.

Conclusions

Concerning the Covid recovered, there are two key public health issues. 1. Would the Covid recovered benefit from also being vaccinated? 2. Should there be vaccine passports and mandates that require them to be vaccinated in order to work and participate in society?

The CDC study did not address the first question, while the Israeli study showed a small but not statistically significant benefit in reducing symptomatic Covid disease. Future studies will hopefully shed more light on this issue.

Based on the solid evidence from the Israeli study, the Covid recovered have stronger and longer-lasting immunity against Covid disease than the vaccinated. Hence, there is no reason to prevent them from activities that are permitted to the vaccinated. In fact, it is discriminatory.

Many of the Covid recovered were exposed to the virus as essential workers during the height of the pandemic before vaccines were available. They kept the rest of society afloat, processing food, delivering goods, unloading ships, picking up garbage, policing the streets, maintaining the electricity network, putting out fires, and caring for the old and sick, to name a few.

They are now being fired and excluded despite having stronger immunity than the vaccinated work-from-home administrators that are firing them.

But keep trusting the CDC, the FDA and other captured agencies that DO NOT stand for truth, honesty of actually doing what's right for you. It's about a bio-security agenda and profits for them and corporations.

Sort:  

Congratulations @whistleblower! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s):

You received more than 100 upvotes.
Your next target is to reach 200 upvotes.

You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

Check out the last post from @hivebuzz:

The new HiveFest⁶ attendee badge is waiting for you
Feedback from the November 1st Hive Power Up Day
Support the HiveBuzz project. Vote for our proposal!