Alright. Another question. If you were building your own community or tribe, running it how you see fit, like a business, with a few rules and guidelines, as people do here, then someone came along and broke your rules, would you be okay with that? Just let it slide?
If people want to overly enforce their policies, then that is up to them. Most of the tribes who do end up enforcing their policies harshly end up faltering, just like MarkyMark's Shittoken "STEM".
Either way, the devs pushed the 20% interest on HBD for the exact purpose of decreasing the influence that tokens have on the second-layer chain. It was never meant to stabilize HBD. So just like the main devs on Hive wanted to decrease the power, it's up to them; Just like it was up to Justin Sun to blacklist the former devs of Steem.
Those who hold witness power, and consensus, control the game. My opinion is meaningless, so your questions are just filled with empty stupidity when you know how this chain works.
You're really daft, aren't you?
It wouldn't matter, at the end of the day. Once again, my opinion is meaningless. Whether I would support it or don't support it.
Yet, I'll answer as if I was a tribe leader...
My tribe would be general (all tags) and if people rightfully owned the stake to the currency that has a scotbot attached to the tribe, then they are free to do as they please with their own voting power and their own posts.
Okay. So that's how you'd run your community. If someone was running theirs and politely suggested you follow their rules, would you be okay with that?
If people want to overly enforce their policies, then that is up to them. Most of the tribes who do end up enforcing their policies harshly end up faltering, just like MarkyMark's Shittoken "STEM".
Alright. Another question. If you were building your own community or tribe, running it how you see fit, like a business, with a few rules and guidelines, as people do here, then someone came along and broke your rules, would you be okay with that? Just let it slide?
If people want to overly enforce their policies, then that is up to them. Most of the tribes who do end up enforcing their policies harshly end up faltering, just like MarkyMark's Shittoken "STEM".
Either way, the devs pushed the 20% interest on HBD for the exact purpose of decreasing the influence that tokens have on the second-layer chain. It was never meant to stabilize HBD. So just like the main devs on Hive wanted to decrease the power, it's up to them; Just like it was up to Justin Sun to blacklist the former devs of Steem.
Those who hold witness power, and consensus, control the game. My opinion is meaningless, so your questions are just filled with empty stupidity when you know how this chain works.
I'm asking how you would react in that scenario. Got an answer?
You're really daft, aren't you?
It wouldn't matter, at the end of the day. Once again, my opinion is meaningless. Whether I would support it or don't support it.
Yet, I'll answer as if I was a tribe leader...
My tribe would be general (all tags) and if people rightfully owned the stake to the currency that has a scotbot attached to the tribe, then they are free to do as they please with their own voting power and their own posts.
Okay. So that's how you'd run your community. If someone was running theirs and politely suggested you follow their rules, would you be okay with that?
Pay attention.
I am. Got an answer?