They cannot change their mindset.
Tau even addresses the rules of changing the rules. It can change its mind.
People really do not know what they want. So that really cannot be put into an AI.
Most people or activites will just be agreeing/negating statements on the network and following parts of their fav people's worldviews.
What if there was chocolate and vanilla ice cream? Which do you like best?
What if there were more flavors of ice cream?
https://tau.net/from-agoras-to-tml/
"Unlike physics, economics depends, and cannot be defined without, concepts that exist purely in human’s imagination. The principle that yields this status of economics is simple but very deep, we cannot have an economy without some subjective valuation (or “utility function”), namely the ability to say “I prefer this over that”. Can think of it like taste, some prefer chocolate over ice cream, while some crazies prefer ice cream over chocolate. They might even be ready to pay different prices. In the bottom line, it comes down to ethical value systems in the broad sense, defining good and bad, better and worse. Which are indeed not physical terms but exist purely on our imagination. And this doesn’t make them a single bit less important."
The core values of people are often not mutual. And often mutually exclusive.
We should have three political parties in America (but the elite couldn't have that.)
Group A: wants structure
Group B: wants safety
Group C: wants freedomAnd carried out to any extreme (sometimes just taking the first logical step) anything that satisfies one group, scares the hell out of the other two groups.
I know these has all been well studied, but we still don't have a discussion scaling platform to see if things are really mutually exclusive and whatnot. Like Tau u can have people from all 3 groups just stating their opinions and directly contribute to improve all 3 aspects in parts where there are without contradictions. All the information isn't just lost at the voting booth, voting just can't scale.