_you can call me by my middle name as trouble ain’t hard to find; you find me anywhere almost all the time; I’m the spirit of degeneracy, violence, and brutality; I am my father’s child born wreckless and wild; and I wear this Mark of Cain, and I live in this house of pain’…_AMM
‘the inquisition was most effective against the isolated truth-seeker in an ignorant community’–FTS.
A note that *Canada’s new hate speech laws in bill C63 are inquisitional and will use the same methodology as the earlier inquisitions…Perhaps not at all surprising if we are dealing with the same toxic family lineages.
FTS is short for the author in question and RCC is short for the Roman Catholic Church.
It’s strange it took me so long to come across this one and I find it similar to
Under The Sign of the Scorpion...
HERE is a link to his book. So much of it confirms my research but we differ in one humongous regard that changes everything: Who is Satan? We’ll get to that dispute.
Saussy is a man of faith in the protestant vein and idolizes scripture which is his first error. This means he is against the Roman Catholic Church’s assertion that salvation can only come through the church and Pontiff and not via a **personal relationship with Christ and his impartation of the truth of scripture as the primary means of salvation. I don’t disagree much with his take on the RCC. He has a chapter wherein he offers compelling evidence that Peter was never in Rome and that Paul was the founder of the RCC and not Peter. Moreover, it is likely more than a coincidence that the RCC stance was precisely the stance that informed the Rabbis when they declared themselves the sole arbiters of scripture after 70AD–there are no coincidences on Conspiracy Lane although one might pronounce it COHENcidence.
In this blog, I’ll focus on reason and logic and how he misses the mark in this arena specifically when it comes to endorsing Hebrew blood magic as the method used by a TRI-OMNI god to solve the problems here on earth. Implied in this stance is that the only method of dealing with the many problems here on earth by a TRI-OMNI god was to use animals and their killing and suffering as an antidote to human wrongdoing and further that a TRI-OMNI god would have to kill itself in another barbarous display of Hebrew blood magic and violence. REALLY? Exactly how does this pass the faculties of reason and logic ‘sniff test?’
One can’t cough up a more bizarre narrative and one can’t help but ask what kind of light bulb went off in god’s mind wherein he thought _‘this is how I will solve the many problems of evil’…_Through violence and blood magic but this is precisely the foundation for FTS’s faith. I simpler explanation is that these ideas are the musings of entirely fallible humans projecting their cultural milieu onto metaphysics although as a Christian Gnostic, I would suggest there is more to it than that.
Some thoughts on faith. Two areas to be considered, I think. Historicity and the faculties of reason and logic. I think a sincere and simple faith can find an easy workaround on the historicity issue and FTS seems to have no problem taking all the narratives in scripture as fact. But to do so goes against honest inquiry driven by the faculties of reason and logic. So although the historicity stance is understandable as a standalone I think it fails if one applies reason and logic to the inquiry. If one wants to take as granted all the official narratives of the patriarchs in the Torah as fact and on faith it is understandable, but I would argue upon extensive research that to do so is also unreasonable and illogical–especially given the scripture ‘let us reason together’...
He’s a top-notch investigator but gives a free pass to the history of the Torah. Why? Especially when there is so much evidence in our era that there is very little within the main stories that have any evidence whatsoever. And this is where his faith differs from any faith I have as I think it’s clear that Yahweh is the devil (diabolos) of scripture; most of the fog clears once one understands this. You then understand why there is little evidence for the primary characters in the Torah as its author is the Father of Lies and there is no chance that the ***True Christ (the spirit of truth and wisdom) was the son of the devil. Of course, this explains why these deceivers wrote the narrative they did in the N.T. that turned the Jesus character into a Jew while also declaring him as the son of the devil with the icing on the cake being that they dared to turn god into a Jew. All this is to protect the character of Yahweh and we should note that there were likely many more Christians in the early centuries that KNEW this and the Rabbis did not like this as they do not like it now.
This brings us to his assessment of Gnosticism which is partial and not well thought out. He does cover the ground of Kabbalah accurately in my view and he’s also one of the few that was able to perceive the THOTH archetype and what it has meant to Freemasonry. So two big thumbs up on that one! But his assessment is weak and myopic as he never deals with alternate gnostic schools–especially the Sethians who understood that Yahweh is NOT THE BIG GUY but is rather the Archon War God of Israel and a product of Father Time (Saturn) and to a larger extent Yaldabaoth. And nowhere is this more problematic than with his interpretation of Cain and what is known as the serpent seed via the rape of Eve by the Archons.
FTS’s stance on Cain and why his offering was rejected is 100% pure speculation although I understand the hermeneutical gymnastics of how he got there. Why blame Cain for something there is NO WAY he could have known–that blood magic via the death of animals and man could appease his maker? NOPE! The simpler explanation; although also having to be taken on faith; is that Cain is the offspring of a raped Eve via the ARCHONS who were not acting against their will but rather acting exactly as they were created to be by Yaldabaoth. And it’s these bloodlines who control the earth via their ROYAL HOUSES. I call them Nephilim Archon Spooks which means FALLEN RULING AGENTS OF THE MATRIX…Although Matrix here means dark womb and the religious/financial nexus which these families created and control and their scope of influence covers all the earth’s territories.
NOTE* everything FTS says about the founding of America can be applied to Canada which I call CAINada. It’s a country founded on colonialism and imperialism and the land was stolen via violence and coercion. Of course, FTS blames it on the RCC but a better fit, in my opinion, is that all of this conquest was done on the specific injunctions of Yahweh who rules via violence and deceit. Some Christians were indeed the proxies for this theft (as he correctly covers) via violence but the root driving cause was and are the injunctions of Yahweh which are still very much active and withall of us today. Indeed, Inquisitions are well on the way again.
Bill C63, like the Inquisitions, will execute LIFE IN PRISON for thinking anything Trudeau and his mafia do not like. So life in prison for not committing any crime but for wrongthink…They will implement this for profit just as the RCC did via the anonymity of the accusers who will profit by $20,000.00 partnered with their bureaucratic friends who will earn 50,000.00 dollars with the added cherry of sentencing anyone they disagree with to life in prison. Whoever wrote this bill can only be described as evil cowards…
A note here on the trope of Babylon which in my view is intentional misdirection away from the root of most of these shenanigans: EGYPT! See my Judaism is Egyptian Spirituality blog where I flesh this out–I cover more ground on the root of America (New Egypt [and Rome])…So it was Egypt and the Hebrew Hyksos Pharaohs who birthed most of this mayhem and they used Babylon in their scripture as a means of misdirection. A part of this today, as yesterday, is to blackwash Zoroasterism, which was the religion of Persia (IRAN) and many of the ideas contained within their religious scripts taught DUALISM and were likely one of the primary templates for where the RCC version of Satan came from–along with some of the core Gnostic concepts.
NOTE** HERE is a link discussing if King James who commissioned the English version of the Bible so loved by this type of Christian was gay. My view as a Christian Gnostic is that King James was indeed gay…But this is not a primary concern of Christian Gnostics as we are better off concentrating on our status as prisoners of metaphysical wardens.
NOTE*** There is not one single first-hand attestation about the Jewish Jesus presented to us in the N.T. But FTS does give us a clue where the story comes from here:
Although I cover more ground along this line in my blog Ceasarion Theory.
Another tack on here as I’ve mentioned previously that the creation of the RCC and every other Christian schism amounting to about 33 thousand sects today all have one common denominator: they all declare that Yahweh is the father of Christ (the spirit of truth and wisdom). COHENcidence? I think not…