In groundbreaking news for the blockchain community, moments ago the SEC issued a press release, referencing an investor bulletin on Initial Coin Offerings, which concluded that DAO Tokens, a Digital Asset, are securities for regulatory purposes, and cautioned that US Securities law "may" apply to offers, sales and trading of interested in virtual organization, targeting the increasingly more popular Initial Coin Offerings.
SEC Enforcement ✔ @SEC_EnforcementCapital raising through blockchain requires compliance with federal securities laws http://ow.ly/hbO230dUvgF
Tweet : https://t.co/IjOxjoVdfK
As a result of this change of treatment, those who use ICOs to sell tokens, which as a reminder have now surpassed over $1 billion in net proceeds, will have to register the tokens as securities, those participating in unregistered offerings may be liable for violations of the securities laws, and that the purpose of the registration "is to ensure that investors are sold investments that include all the proper disclosures and are subject to regulatory scrutiny for investors' protection."
In a press release issued on Tuesday afternoon, the SEC said it had issued an investigative report "cautioning market participants that offers and sales of digital assets by "virtual" organizations are subject to the requirements of the federal securities laws." Such offers and sales, conducted by organizations using distributed ledger or blockchain technology, have been referred to, among other things, as "Initial Coin Offerings" or "Token Sales." In its first official regulatory intervention of ICOs, the SEC said that "whether a particular investment transaction involves the offer or sale of a security – regardless of the terminology or technology used – will depend on the facts and circumstances, including the economic realities of the transaction."
Some more details from the report, highlights by ZeroHedge.com:
"""
The SEC's Report of Investigation found that tokens offered and sold by a "virtual" organization known as "The DAO" were securities and therefore subject to the federal securities laws. The Report confirms that issuers of distributed ledger or blockchain technology-based securities must register offers and sales of such securities unless a valid exemption applies. Those participating in unregistered offerings also may be liable for violations of the securities laws. Additionally, securities exchanges providing for trading in these securities must register unless they are exempt. The purpose of the registration provisions of the federal securities laws is to ensure that investors are sold investments that include all the proper disclosures and are subject to regulatory scrutiny for investors' protection.
"The SEC is studying the effects of distributed ledger and other innovative technologies and encourages market participants to engage with us," said SEC Chairman Jay Clayton. "We seek to foster innovative and beneficial ways to raise capital, while ensuring – first and foremost – that investors and our markets are protected."
"Investors need the essential facts behind any investment opportunity so they can make fully informed decisions, and today's Report confirms that sponsors of offerings conducted through the use of distributed ledger or blockchain technology must comply with the securities laws," said William Hinman, Director of the Division of Corporation Finance.
The SEC's Report stems from an inquiry that the agency’s Enforcement Division launched into whether The DAO and associated entities and individuals violated federal securities laws with unregistered offers and sales of DAO Tokens in exchange for "Ether," a virtual currency. The DAO has been described as a "crowdfunding contract" but it would not have met the requirements of the Regulation Crowdfunding exemption because, among other things, it was not a broker-dealer or a funding portal registered with the SEC and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.
"The innovative technology behind these virtual transactions does not exempt securities offerings and trading platforms from the regulatory framework designed to protect investors and the integrity of the markets," said Stephanie Avakian, Co-Director of the SEC's Enforcement Division.
Steven Peikin, Co-Director of the Enforcement Division added, "As the evolution of technology continues to influence how businesses operate and raise capital, market participants must remain cognizant of the application of the federal securities laws."
In light of the facts and circumstances, the agency has decided not to bring charges in this instance, or make findings of violations in the Report, but rather to caution the industry and market participants: the federal securities laws apply to those who offer and sell securities in the United States, regardless whether the issuing entity is a traditional company or a decentralized autonomous organization, regardless whether those securities are purchased using U.S. dollars or virtual currencies, and regardless whether they are distributed in certificated form or through distributed ledger technology.
The SEC's Office of Investor Education and Advocacy today issued an investor bulletin educating investors about ICOs. As discussed in the Report, virtual coins or tokens may be securities and subject to the federal securities laws. The federal securities laws provide disclosure requirements and other important protections of which investors should be aware. In addition, the bulletin reminds investors of red flags of investment fraud, and that new technologies may be used to perpetrate investment schemes that may not comply with the federal securities laws.
The SEC's investigation in this matter was conducted in the New York office by members of the SEC's Distributed Ledger Technology Working Group (DLTWG) -- Pamela Sawhney, Daphna A. Waxman, and Valerie A. Szczepanik, who heads the DLTWG -- with assistance from others in the agency's Divisions of Corporation Finance, Trading and Markets, and Investment Management. The investigation was supervised by Lara Shalov Mehraban.
"""
The SEC's decision to "register" ICOs may have a similar effect to its denial to allow a bitcoin ETF, which initially sent the price of bitcoin tumbling but then promptly reversed, and pushed it back to all time highs.
While the SEC's intention to regulate ICOs will probably have an initial chilling effect on the market as it will make issuance of ICOs more difficult, it will also prove to be a blessing in disguise as it not only validates the blockchain capital-raising mechanism, allowing the entrance of major banks to use it as a fintech alternative to IPOs, but considering some of the utterly idiotic and doomed to failure ICOs that have been observed in recent weeks, curb the proliferation of ponzi, pyramid and other get rich quick schemes which in many cases are beyond borderline criminal.
It will also also reduce the risk of drastic losses once the initial euphoria period passes, and only the more serious and credible coin offerings remain as a result, something which ultimately will benefit the blockchain in general, and ethereum in particular.
Ultimately regulation of ICO will greenlight the eventual use of cryptos as eligible collateral in capital markets transactions, something Bank of America said in a report earlier today is critical to truly unleash the crypto community to its next evolutionary step in replacing fiat.
Whether cryptocoin enthusiasts like it or not, regulation (and enforcement) will lead to a sturdier blockchain ecosystem, and while the potential for dramatic upward moves will be limited, so will the likelihood of catastrophic losses.
Disclaimer : This is not the real Tyler Durden! I read ZeroHedge every day to find the one or two best articles and reformat them for Steemit. I appreciate the upvotes but consider following the account and resteeming the articles that you think deserve attention instead. Thank you!
Head over to ZeroHedge.com for more news about cryptocurrency, politics and the economy.
I had been wondering when the SEC would come out with a statement about this sort of thing. It sounds, to me, like they are trying to distance themselves from the whole market to an extent. This statement still doesn't make their position very clear, unfortunately.
It's interesting that the SEC gave The DAO a pass. Maybe because the HF recouped investor funds and the SEC decided not to prosecute since there weren't financial losses to investors?
Yeah they basically did all they can.
Say these ICOs are subject to the laws that they have been supposedly subject to all along.
A great big, don’t do it.
Can’t stop anyone really.
I knew something like this was bound to come out. But like you, I agree, they need to come out and elaborate a bit more on what they said. Meanwhile, I switched to Whaleclub to do my trading with BTC, annnd fiats etc when aug 1st rolls around lol.
Use my link and get 30% bonus on your first deposit!
Link: https://whaleclub.co/join/NcE0h
Simply the SEC trying to find a way to get their cut. The only thing this protects is their pocketbooks.
Yeah they can do all the “requiring” they want.
Nothing is going to stop decentralized and “virtual” companies from raising funding through assets not regulated by the US government.
Nothing changes. There will always be unrestricted ICOs
Several ICOs have tried to limit themselves to US customers. How did that work? They can try and cover their asses but if they want but to do anything on Ethereum, you can’t restrict transactions very well.
KYC/AML is coming to ICOs.
New contracts for token sales might put different sets of KYC type systems into operation but to be honest, doing this defeats the entire purpose of an ICO.
Is this the official ZH account on Steemit?
I broke this exact news FIRST right here on Steemit:
SEC Bulletin on Crypto Initial Coin Offerings: Concludes They are Securities, Subject to Federal Securities Laws
Great post @zer0hedge and cheers to your continued community support.
I post regularly about Steemit, Bitcoin and other crypto related material, check out my Steemit page and follow and VOTE UP for the FASTEST active news you can run with! :D
Thank you,
Jeffrey Anderson
Editor in Chief
The Anderson Report
@cryptoNEWScoins on Twitter
Just to let you know, the way you post these does not fall under fair usage and despite giving credit is still technically infringement if you aren't publishing with the author's permission.
Just a matter of time till the SEC got invovled
I think I've seen this movie before....it ends with Americans not being allowed to participate in future ICOs.
They want to be able and tax u.
Will have to keep an eye on this and see what comes of this announcement. Thanks for the info. Keep Steemin! Upvoted.
He is the author from zerohedge.com lol
?
Great infomation, but something is not quite right. I'll need to research on my own to verify.
It doesn't make sense because they are mostly pretending to have jurisdiction.
https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@annie.oakley/is-bitcoin-property-is-it-currency-does-it-even-matter
The crypto boys need to stay out of all US and UCC jurisdictions all along the chain and they need to hit back 10 times harder if there are any make believe attempts of establishing jurisdiction under the color of law.
Anyone too lazy/ignorant to learn/understand the language will get hit hard, unfortunately it's like that game children play where the floor is lava, and you are trying to jump around the furniture without falling in.
Yeah, I played that game as a kid. I try not to play it now.
Should be good news for EOS.
Such a great topic. I am glad I read this post!
Now I understand the dip in crypto today, and the fairly quick stabilization.
They make me laugh. Sweet blockchain , oh what have we done to poor SEC
"SEC Cracks Down On "Initial Coin Offerings": Concludes Tokens Are Subject To Securities Laws" ... in other words they'll do as they always do, look the other way and pretend no laws were broken.
I agree, regulation and enforcement will lead to a more stable and trusted blockchain system. Very informative post. Enjoyed it.
ICOs are nonsense anyway, its just a get rich quick scheme that I hope will be removed from the crypto world soon. I didnt see one ICO yet where the project needed the funds; if you really believe in what you are doing, build it, then advertise it when it works, y'know like every crypto did until The DAO came along. Now all of a sudden you simply cant launch a project without tens of millions of dollars, weird.
A wiseman once mentioned that 90% of ICOs don't work and 90% of those are a scam... However, at a purist level and in the original spirit of blockchain advancement, the mechanism could be used for innovation on an unprecedented scale. Think like many others, that the recent saturation has been driven by profiteers and funded by eager speculators, hungry for the quick buck. This recent boogeyman may at least serve as a deterrent against another wave of fools gold and make way for some products with substance