Why would I mean it that way? Why would they get split based on amount of accounts holding HP rather than split equally based on HP?
That would just encourage people to create more accounts like your friend trying to milk rewards you were crying about the other day.
Whatever you meant, what you actually typed is wrong.
No it's not, only dumbasses would assume it was meant in the way that it would be distributed in an equal amount with tens of thousands of accounts rather than based on HP since everything else works based on HP on a proof of stake blockchain. Go be annoying somewhere else.
Lmao, so you are the type who needs the win over being correct. Gotcha
Not really, I have no problem with people calling out any mistakes and I welcome them to do so and often admit I'm not 100% sure on certain things but given your recent history it seems like you're just trying to nitpick random stuff most people wouldn't misunderstand just to be annoying.
If you are trying to clarify something, it helps to be clear. You are not being clear here and I think you are just butthurt from our recent history, but I'm not. I wipe the slate clean between every disagreement.
If I were nitpicking, I'd have mentioned the few other type-o's and misspellings within the post as well.
I'm not convinced.
What I know that is very clear, is that you are trying to misdirect users to the fact that you with higher stakes do indeed benefit more from downvoting than the average user. So, that makes the point in question a lie.