There's a real possibility that another vote would also be glitched, creating more confusion. So, perhaps it's best to go ahead with current vote and be done with it. But I guess it'll need some 'promotion', only 2 votes so far, it was kinda overshadowed by the recent issues & fork.
I agree that hangouts effort deserves this incentive. I am voting in favor.
I doubt that even with promotion that people will vote on a glitched out poll :/
We should ditch all these extra fields, relying solely on the non-foundation voting mechanism & hold all the foundation fields on the related URL page.. meh
All my Foundation votes were glitched from the very beginning. Never managed to track down the problem. But people voted nevertheless (although in lower numbers than for non-glitched votes).
I completely agree that there is no need for extra fields in Foundation votes, nor for a separate Foundation voting mechanism in general. Less is often more, proved yet again.
The poll system could need another field for a longer description. Trying to keep it all in the title is to difficult sometimes. There we could post all the information required for additional expenses polls for example. The field could be limited to around 250 characters. Longer explanations should be linked to.