You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: 我對HF21免費點爛的看法 My perspective on free downvotes in HF21

in #hf215 years ago

You are hurting this platform with your greed, and this is not good.

Here is a thread about why (in the comments). This steemian took it seriously and did some research, reflected and understood.

A very short summary:
-Buying a position in trending for content that doesn't deserve it makes a very bad image of steem.
-'Raping the reward pool like you do means that there is by far less for others.

I hope you have an interest in steem as a whole, but maybe you are just here to take short time advantage.

Sort:  

You may as well say I'm reminding steem, and I think it may make steem better in the long run.
As I mentioned in the post, much of the demands come from it. We are who buy steem, while most of content producers sell steem and reduce steem price.
Your comments are inefficient, and even wrong. It will be much more efficient to split the reward pool as I wrote, and the investors would be better to judge about using bit bots. That can raise the steem price, and make whole steem system better.
Origin bitcoin built on miner's greed and selfishness, but it can be used to establish a peer-to-peer electronic cash system. The point is to make rules, not to tell people what to do. I hope you can think about it, instead of being stubborn on the old thought.

Do you think your post deserves to be in trending?
Did you read the thread/link?

btw.: We don't make rules here (look up 'decentralized'), we just tell people what is good, and what sucks. And we up- and downvote.

I'd also be interested where you think I'm inefficient and wrong.

Yes.
Yes again. But my point of view is different from you. That can't convince me.
We don't make rules here, but there are rules here. We can affect that by voting, and cause the HF to change the rules. Codes are rules. I can't make rules myself, cos I'm not a top witness, and I can't code.
That's one of the reasons that I buy votes: try to inflence others and change the rule.
The dropping price, community activity already proved your throught is inefficient.

You are quite new here, with a reputation that you bought, and only one really stupid bidbot extravaganza.
Wonder when you'll find out that you:
Waste your steem.
Waste your time.
Waste the time of others.

Till then enjoy!

It does waste my time trying to communicate with you.

OK fine, flag my little spider post you big bid-bot abuser abuser post guy! Whatever, you know you were in the wrong, maybe you will get bitten by a spider too, or worse?????? No me but Karma is a Bitch! Have Fun With that, no escaping it! You are my target now!!! I see you're name ends with 911, better put it on speed-dial!

Screen Shot 2019-07-02 at 9.02.34 AM.png

Don't "Bug" me - I won't bug you, ok! I read your post, saw the happy face retaliation line, I liked that! lol

I flagged you for some grammar,

"I read this article(the link above) a few days ago. He thinks"

I don't think starting the sentence with HE is appropriate. The article is not a person, you are making us stretch our imagination a little bit too much because now I need to assume the writer is a HE.

I would change it to something along the lines of...

"The author thinks there may be another flag war coming...."

I don't know, however I spotted an error in there somewhere, that is why I flagged you!

If you bid bot it up to the top, you should make sure it is perfect first!! K

No errors = No flags from me!
Get it, Got It, Good!
I don't care if you use a little bit of bid bots, but errors will draw my attention to the flag button.
-Thanks!
Good Luck!

You the one abusing the bidbots, you have no right flagging me back on this one! Dumb move!