🤗 Help support my channel:
❇️ www.subscribestar.com/TheOuterLight
👁 https://www.Patreon.com/TheOuterDark
📄 https://hive.blog/@theouterlight
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/theouterlight/
3Speak: https://3speak.online/user/theouterlight
Chat-room:
👾 https://discord.gg/2YNKCwc
▶️ 3Speak
Wojcicki is obviously a Muggle. She makes it apparent that she has no idea what she's talking about and she thinks that by deferring to the authority of the WHO that she has somehow done the community a great service. She has pretty much single-handedly run YouTube into the ground in various other ways, and it's just a matter of time before viewers and content creators wholesale abandon ship and ad revenue follows them. The Chinese have been very keen to capitalize on this with TikTok and they're doing a damn good job of eating up YouTube's market share in the wake of the arbitrary censorship that Susan has put into place. Hopefully platforms like 3speak will snatch up some of that share. It sickens me a little to think that YouTube used to be one of the premier decentralizing forces in society. Google even invited Ron Paul to speak there and YouTube hosted the videos of those talks back in the day! Imagine YouTube or Google promoting , for example, Thomas Massie today. It would be unthinkable.
I find it incredible that you would fall for the incompetence cover, rather than make the obvious conclusion that the clearly coordinated assault on free speech across all centralized media platforms is a venal attack deliberately undertaken for political purposes.
Apparently she's worth every penny of the immense salary she's paid for executing that censorship, because she gets a pass from you for it.
Amazing.
I find it incredible that you think my aspersions constitute giving her a pass. Since any malicious intent she may have is beyond my knowledge, rather than pretend to know what fills the hearts of evil people, I prefer to go off of what they say about themselves and their motivations as if they're telling the truth. This doesn't mean she definitely is telling the truth, it's just the only concrete thing I have to base a judgement off of. Wojcicki says some things here that make it evident that she's at least an idiot, so I don't have any particular problem calling her one. I don't afford her enough respect to suppose otherwise. Also, having spent a significant amount of time listening to the candid thoughts of people like her in private conversations and public lectures, I know that any number of rationalizations can be weaved in their minds to prop up the lies they tell themselves. As much as I wouldn't be surprised that she's part of some evil conspiracy, I would be equally unsurprised if she's just what she seems on the surface: a rationalizing fool, a frightened and ignorant person deferent to authority with a tendency towards religiosity and righteous indignance in the face of anything that challenges her world view.
It is unreasonable to ignore the global coordination of censorship across platforms, and failing to call it what it is, and the $B's being spent to censor factual information - literally driving customers from their platforms - isn't stupid.
It's Machiavellian. Failing to call it what it is lulls folks into a false sense of security, and these are existentially threatening times. There is a global totalitarian ubergovernment being imposed on the world, and she's front and center.
Censorship isn't an inconvenience. It's a death threat, and particularly regarding pandemic,and the WHO. They're killing people. They're not killing them because they're stupid. They're killing them because the victims are in the way of their goals, just like factual information.
I can definitely agree on the existential threat. People will certainly die because of her behavior and the behavior of other media platforms that censor factual information in the same way. Their actions are also apparently coordinated across platforms. They definitely don't care about us either. Whether they're actively trying to kill us is a different matter. Ultimately it seems as though she's covering her ass here by doing this because YouTube long ago assumed the position of controlling and policing content on their platform rather than simply being a utility, a medium through which people may express themselves. This kind of censorship is the necessary logical conclusion of such a position, because now they had to expose themselves to the liability associated with what people say on YouTube in order to maintain desired control over content. Even if they wanted to at this point, they can't let people say this stuff because it exposes them to the liability associated with it. It would end them. They have to credibly show that they're "doing something" about what's being said on YouTube.
I guess the major difference between you and I is that you lean more towards calling it straight up murder, while I lean more towards negligent homicide. I just don't have enough respect for their intellect to step over that line and agree with you. I don't think there's some master plan. I think they just want what they want and they don't care much how they achieve it as long as their asses are covered while they seek it. I think that the motives are more localized and personal than they are conspiratorial. These people will unite when it benefits them directly, but they aren't exactly in lock step with each other. There are hints of this in the way that the various companies wrestle with each other for market share and the way in which politicians do the same for votes. They don't care about anything except maintaining their position and power. They will dispose of each other at the slightest whiff of weakness. It's all a big clown car with no steering wheel. They're all a bunch of idiots for thinking that they could somehow wrest control of it.
Well, I grant I tend to focus on dangers. Prolly due to my lucky survival of a trying youth. I learned to view folks negligent enough to do things that could kill you as murderous, and managed to live because of it.
I don't think you fully grasp the Assange situation. The actual conclusion of the position they're in will involve public executions IMHO.
Also, I recall mafioso would kill each other in violent battles for control of the mob, but defend the mob and it's income side by side. Contests for control are internal, even if they have external impact (which are minimized by wise gangsters).
This does not indicate they don't have a wheel to fight over. I note that more than half the population of the planet is currently under some form of house arrest, and that this has happened in a very short period of time, with but few exceptions like Belarus and Sweden.
From Washington to Wuhan, calls for mandatory vaccination are also common. There's too much coordination across the planet for any supposed lack of plan.
It's a desperate plan, because the decentralization of production has begun, and unless they impose a global tyranny now, they won't be able to once that tech develops and distributes enough.
But, it's a plan, not just a bunch of psychopaths vying with each other for control. It shows global coordination to have something to control over which to contest.
The psyop is the pointy end of the assault, and that's why the censorship is brutal presently. Perhaps you did not note that Alex Jones was censored across the tech platforms in one day. That's coordination. The same is happening with the trailer for 'Greenland'. It's not just suddenly vanished from Youtube, but when someone uploaded a copy of that trailer to Bitchute, it vanished there too.
Were the platforms simply competing, they couldn't be censoring as blatantly as they are, because the competing platforms would profit when they censored by picking up the content and audience as more exclusive. Further, the censorship is destructive to their profits. It's not competition, it's narrative control for a central purpose that is a psyop intended to render the whole population of the planet compliant under tyranny.
However, for the psyop to work as intended, we need to not walk outside and note the lack of corpse collectors and scenes reminiscent of the paintings of Hieronymous Bosch.
It's not gonna work, and failing to note it was a murderous attempt to enslave us all will prevent nooses from decorating lampposts filled with traitorous necks.
That would be a shame. Treachery so dire surely requires just recompense.
Hey @theouterlight, did you know there are nineteen other video sharing sites other than YouTube and 3Speak. Diversification of sites is how we break bans against YouTube users.
Please consider using the #informationwar tag and posting in our community for posts like this, so we can upvote you!
Curated for #informationwar (by @truthforce)
Delegate to the @informationwar! project and get rewarded