You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Let's change 1SP 30 votes (current) to 1SP 1vote

1 SP 1 vote is a goal worth discussion. But there should be a lot of discussions before it is changed. Also let's consider it for SPS, too. In any case, if it is changed to this and Tron can still vote, they can over-rule any hard fork forever using a stake that was supposed to be non-governance according to a lot of people. Remove their say in the matter and there is no way that will get close to 50% support.

Power down change SPS result was about 49-51 to change it from 13 to 4 weeks. This suggests that people want it reduced, but even reducing it to 4 weeks is too much, nevermind reducing it to 1 week. Perhaps it could be left alone or reduced to somewhere around 5-12 weeks? The exchanges definitely should not get a 'specialized' quicker power down, but there should be options available for all to permit this.


I'm happy to see a discussion about downvote seemingly off the table for now. I personally think we should wait until after SMT is implemented to look into changing the inflation distribution model again.

There is a lot of disagreement with the idea of including 1 of those parties as the Korean group. For example, the USA group or the EU group or even the latin/spanish group may represent more SP more individuals and more content on Steem. It is an unnatural division and seems to be only happening because the Koreans have unionized under SCT. Any rights gained will likely be immediately taken away.

Just my thoughts. Good luck to all with the 4 party meeting.

Sort:  

Thank you for your opinion.

As far as know, the Korean community takes 1 seat only because they are hosting the event. If, say Spanish group had hosted the event I am pretty sure that they would get one seat. So please go ahead and host your discussion session if you desire.


"Any rights gained will likely be immediately taken away":

I am not sure what you meant by "rights", as I do not think there is any right that was additionally given. Let me know if it were not the case.

"Immediately taken away"... so you or the group you imply to represent have power and/or intention to take something away from the Korean community. I see.

Thank you for pointing this out clearly. It reminds me of the suspiction that once this drama resolves then the Korean community and users who did not support 22.2 may get attacked again like before.

Your meeting, your decision and they agreed. It's always better than no discussion. I look forward to the outcome. I just don't see how any trust can be built. But I'm usually skeptical and pessimistic around here.


*https://hypestat.com/info/steemit.com

  • Korea is the country with the third user.

Wow, I had no idea Korea was number 3. Koreans really like using the Internet so I guess it isn't that surprising. That's really neat data, thank's for sharing.

A few thoughts:

  1. Why only Steemit? Justin represents Steemit. Having a collection of popular Steem access points to add would be better (#steempeak, #partiko, #esteem, etc).
  2. Why does this qualify 3rd place Korea above US or India? Could you agree to a representative from India and US? Why only top 3 only?
  3. Why do we go based on individual IP addresses (actually I think this is ok)? What about stake or active accounts.
  4. How does IP hiding/routing affect this data?
  5. Most importantly Why do we go with countries? There are regions and cultural divisions, too. Further Steem is a blockchain that is global in reach and transcends nations. Let's look beyond nationalism. Korean is just language and content parameter on Steem.

I hope you or your community will hold a meeting for their agreement.
The Korean community is getting tired, too.

I hope you or your community will hold a meeting for their agreement.
The Korean community is getting tired, too.

There have been several meetings held. I believe this complicates it.

If you believe so, take care of it your way. I don't mean to disturb your efforts.