Right now I do not agree with the penalty for those who do not use the community frontend. We cannot want to force people to use a front end that is behind others that are more user friendly.
This I think should be implemented but only after our front end has been completely renovated, it ends up becoming something pleasant and user friendly for people.
At this point I agree to implement something like this to bring more traffic to our front end.
At this moment SPORTS is unable to attract any investor due to the fact that the maximum supply is huge and due to the fact that the token is made by anyone even when there is no content that adds value to the community.
I actually agree with you on that point and hadn't seen it that way and why it is good to discuss these things.
Other than the speed of a platform like Peakd what do you feel makes our site behind other sites in terms of user friendliness? In terms of SPORTS we already have custom features like the sports menu tags and even suggestive tags when publishing to help align content. Maybe there are things we can add in to ours that would make it feel more feature complete.
I think in SPORTS front end we cannot save drafts as we can in peakd
It will save a draft if you start a post but there isn't anywhere near the level of multiple drafts management and future posting features that Peakd offers. You can however save Templates that can act like drafts and then delete after you no longer need that draft.
Having a deeper draft system is something that I'm sure would be upstream merged to Hive Engine Nitrous if we found someone to add it.
Nice to see you here, May be have some inbuilt burning mechanism and roadmap. If we just want it as posting frontend only that token inflation is too huge and need to be taken care of.
One of my first proposals will be to adopt something that I seen @stemgeeks do ages ago with their non-tribe page penalty burn. I think it makes a lot of sense for the tribe's long term growth especially once the advertising is fixed. I've already consulted to find the costs for the contract changes and just waiting until the proposals are ready to see if the tribe agrees that is the right way to go.
I don't think I'll ever fully be for drastically decreasing the token production. Since we have such a large disbursement early on if we lower it we are essentially setting a ruling class of anyone who owns those large amounts. There wouldn't be the same earning potential for future users to offset the gains that early adopters made.
Penalty burn will certainly solve some problem of inflation and it also make distinction who are putting as extra tag vs "only sports".
Inflation can be controlled by introducing new token that will be swapped with existing SPORTS, new token will come with fairly less supply and less inflation.