You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Debate: at which rate should the non-airdropped stake be converted to HBD ?

Why not burn this ninja mining completely instead to keep going with this legacy problem. The fund is rising already naturally with the parameters set in place.

Sort:  

Read my last point, the fund is depleting.

Perhaps the answer to this is to manage the fund and funded proposals better. If the fund is still not adequate then look at the source of the funding again. Is it enough? Or is it just not actively managed?

Why not rid ourselves of this stake? Why not strive to be different?

Burning it would also burn 20 million dollars in market cap since this stake counts towards that I believe.