You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Balancing Freeos and Snipverse revenue [EN-FR]

freeos doesnt even Have a platform yet do they?

its just a token. they dont even have a real dao like hive and telos have do they?

on snipverse i even have a hiveblog group setup already! https://snipverse.com/hiveblog

oh and whats wrong with 10% apr? golos pays 15% i rhink on golospower hivepower pays what 3 to 5 % ? you get 10% exactly from dlease

so wait whats the issue? hivepower also pays 10% or more ... hbd pays 20% apr ..

snips stake and hivepower both pay 10% apr so whats the problem?

oh your saying freeos is better but how? where is the working freeos dapp? i dont see it or any screenshots i see no dao

Sort:  

Have a look at https://freeos.io
download the app, it is working very well and voting is working.
and https://thedaoscape.com
The freeos dao is in beta
I don't say freeos is better, and I did not say that 10 % APR is bad. You know what the problem is: 40 people owning 50 % of the wealth of the planet and inequalities are increasing. I said that staking membership fees is an excellent idea. I only try to improve the system by proposing a better redistribution. Why do you need investors to make all your great ideas come true? It would be much better if you could only need redistribution from happy users.