Dr Jha, the COVID Response Coordinator on the President's taks force, sounds like a "conspiracy theorist" of yesteryear

in Informationwar2 years ago (edited)

covid19_20211107.png

Listen to Dr Ashish Jha in a recent public address (link below). There he basically admits that there is no rational for COVID-related indoor distancing, that whether or not you get infected depends on a number of factors including how well-ventilated the area is where you happen to be, So how he now says that whether you spend less or more than 15 minutes next to a virus carrier, or whether you maintain the 6ft/2m distance is less significant than the air quality around you.

So all of this hardship that was forced onto the populace - that was for naught? And "conspiracy theorists" and "science deniers" were right? How long have Dr Jha and his colleagues known that?

Be that as it may - it is not time to "forgive, forget and move on", it is time to question all those involved, especially those in the government and get the answers they owe us. Incompetence in government needs not be tolerated; criminality in government needs to be tolerated even less. And yes, in case we have some made up assertions presented be government officials as scientific knowledge this should, at least in this author's opinion, be viewed as criminal fraud, and those responsible need to be prosecuted.

References

The President's COVID Response Coordinator Makes STUNNING Admission
via Dinesh D'Souza, 17 August 2022

Ashish Jha (wiki)

Sort:  

As we talked in one of your previous posts, many people who once got vaccinated have been anti-vaxxer. The number of those people could increase with such news.

I don't know about you but personally I have not met - nor heard of - many people who reject all vaccines and see no value in vaccination. As for these COVID "vaccines", so called (they wouldn't even qualify as vaccines under the old definition) - well, being wary of them is just common sense. This is experimental technology, developed by parties that have a questionable reputation, using a process that they don't want to be transparent about, with more and more evidence coming out that shows that bad side effects are not so infrequent. It sounds like common sense to me to be suspicious of a technology like that.

pixresteemer_incognito_angel_mini.png
Bang, I did it again... I just rehived your post!
Week 119 of my contest just started...you can now check the winners of the previous week!
15