I believe we agree on this. My only suggestion was that the "christians" adopted the practice from "the bible" (and we all know where that came from).
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I believe we agree on this. My only suggestion was that the "christians" adopted the practice from "the bible" (and we all know where that came from).
if you are referring to the modern KJV, yes. A distortion of the 'original' a thousand times over.
However the codes are still there. Only for those with eyes to see.
"Circumcision" of the Heart.
And on the eighth day the flesh of his foreskin shall be circumcised.
https://biblia.com/bible/esv/leviticus/12/2-3
Ok yes, but I quoted New Testament.
Precisely my point.
Are you familiar with the difference?
I've never met a "christian" that can accept the one without the other.
Interesting. This is why I care about where folks 'hail' from.
It is illogical to me to think it has no bearing.
Perhaps you have never met an actual Christian. Perhaps, you met their impostors, the "Christian"Zionists.
Hint: Actual Christians don't go to Mega Churches ;)
In fact they may even follow their esoteric teaching that the Church does not want...like, things that were 'removed' from the KJV, and those 'christians' believe their footnotes in their abomination Scofield 'Bibles'
This will shed more light onto what I am saying, and give you a whole new perspective on generalizing "Christian", if you care :) :
True GNOSTICS are very difficult to locate.
I'm glad you recognize that. Very true. They have been exterminated, weeded out, Purged. Still going.