I made a similar argument with regards to female genital mutation. My argument was: Could we not call it child genital mutilation? Almost always there was a huge pushback. I have given up. We have to do the fight against male genital mutilation on our own.
The urge to protect women at the expense of men is deeply engrained in the human physic.
In the 1970 some European countries had Ministry of Family Affairs. By now they have been renamed to Ministry for Women, Children and Elderly. Notice who is now missing?
The USA once had a law against domestic violence. By now this law has been replaced by the Violence against Women Acts. Notice which violence is now ignored.
Any "human rights conference" would focus on women's rights and eventually be renamed to ”women's rights conference“.
As such it is absolutely necessary fro men's rights to differentiate themselves from the more general human rights.
Good point. For some reason, Christians just love mutilating baby boys.
Ok, maybe they could call it "men's human rights movement"?
Or could they go with "EAT THE RICH"!!
oR, DON'T BE BRAINWASHED BY THE "HERO MYTH"!!
4 minutes,
I do know the original reason: preventing mastubation.
Of course the reason changed over time as mastubation was destigmatised but that was the ordinal reason.
Yes, is actually one of the names we use. MRA is actually a given name. Given to us by feminists.
I'm not sure that was the "original" intent.
It's my understanding that the "christians" adopted it from some obscure middle eastern tribe.
Do you see how you went for the Christians and left out the Jews? Why did you do this?
Because I thought it was obvious when I said, "for some reason".
"Judeo-Christian"
Is a farce. "Christian" Zionists are the most duped of all. They serve the demon they profess to be against.
You are either Christian, or you are a Zionist. There is no both.
Circumcision of the 'Heart' is the 'Christian' way. Circumcision of the penis is the other, brutal, traumatizing way.
Which only the christians of the USA still do. Christians in Europe have all stopped over 50 years ago. Or never started in the first place.
See my posting on Kellogg above.
I believe we agree on this. My only suggestion was that the "christians" adopted the practice from "the bible" (and we all know where that came from).
if you are referring to the modern KJV, yes. A distortion of the 'original' a thousand times over.
However the codes are still there. Only for those with eyes to see.
"Circumcision" of the Heart.
And on the eighth day the flesh of his foreskin shall be circumcised.
https://biblia.com/bible/esv/leviticus/12/2-3