RE: ✈️#911Truth Part 14: Building 7 Turning to Dust for Over 7 Hours (Fast Forward 45X Speed)

[valued-customer]

Sadly, it is not the evidence the links provided discuss that is unrelated to reality, but your own dismissal of it.

"Where is this "super hot surface"?"

Where those guys in the undated, unsourced pics you provided are not standing. You'll note in the first link images that show there were many places that were not heated to that degree. Those are the places where people could stand and work to destroy the crime scene.

Did you not see with your own eyes the molten steel pouring out of the towers?

Did you not read the statements of Loizeau and Tully, experts in demolition that discussed the pools of molten steel?

"The molten metal burned under the rubble for weeks, with the final fires not being extinguished until December of 2001, three months after the disaster."

https://www.ae911truth.org/evidence/faqs/365-faq-5-what-was-the-molten-metal-seen-pouring-out-of-the-south-tower-minutes-before-its-collapse

If you did not read them, or watch the video, or the analysis of professional architects and engineers, that's on you. They're in the links I provided. If you want to know the facts you have them available to you.

At least you now know without a doubt I am not making it up.

Comments

[mes]

Where is this "molten steel"? And more importantly how would "molten anything" turn most of all 7 towers into dust leaving very little rubble, seismic impact, noise, or projectiles?

Where are these "pools of molten steel"?

And why are you appealing to bogus authority figures, "experts", and why are you propping up controlled opposition "AE911Truth"?

Lastly, are you going to provide any evidence?

The evidence of the towers turning to dust is right in front of your eyes, see my 9/11 video you are commenting on...

---

FYI I have covered the molten disinfo in my video 3 years ago, and you can see it at the 2:49:00 mark of my Part 6 video: https://youtu.be/aDWgsVSo4Oc?t=10139

---

As for the images I sent earlier, they were on 9/11: https://www.flickr.com/photos/rudis323/35365557215/

And the onus is on you to find the 800 degree C pools which were measured a week after 9/11, and you can't just make up claims that "they were destroying the crime scene". The photo I sent had pools of water. If the temperature were even remotely hot the water would boil.

There are many videos just moments after the twin towers fell in which people are walking around just fine right beside the remains and right next to the exact location of the towers. In fact there were survivors stuck inside a Stairwell right next to the towers,and they were stuck for hours. (See the 27:00 mark of the video to see people casually walking around the North Tower).

[forensic911]

Dear @valued-customer, I propose you a short exercise of CRITICAL THOUGHT in three questions, simple and effective:

1. Have you ever seen the light emitted by thermite in action and compared it with the videos of the disintegration of the twin towers? What are the obvious differences?
2. Given the enormous heat needed to disintegrate everything (steel, concrete, glass and various contents in the towers), can you tell me how many people were hospitalized on September 11, 2001 following the destructive event of the World Trade Center in New York?
3. Is thermite able to transform the 107-storey structure into fine dust, so much so as to leave the survivors unscathed (and not burned) on a third-floor staircase and not crushed by 107 floors that a few seconds earlier were above them nor burnt to death by the very high heat theorized to generate the "mythical molten steel"?

If you prefer to believe (presumed) authority, you are free to do so... but do the beliefs spread by AE911Truth go against the logic and evidence of the facts?

[mes]

@forensic911 I wouldn't worry too much about the disinfo agent "valued-customer". He is just here to push the same usual bogus controlled opposition lies.

[mes]

You're still pushing the bogus non-existent explosives and AE911truth disinfo?

This isn't the place for your lies and willful ignorance.

[mes]

Thanks for sharing your views on 9/11. As for my view, the technical details are everything. 9/11 is about the suppression of free energy technology, holographic projection technology, and weather control technology. The non-existent thermite and non-existent explosives disinformation as well as the non-existent and irrelevant molten nonsense are just attempts to steer the truth movement into dead ends and make it easy for the mainstream media to debunk and laugh at.

[mes]

I am not calling you a liar but I do apologize for stating you were "making stuff up" (I have edited it out from my earlier messages).

I meant to state that what you and others call "molten steel" is not due to conventional heat, and likely isn't even steel; and doesn't even account for the towers turning to dust.

For example, AE911Truth makes the claim that an excavator was picking up "1200 degree C molten metal".

https://www.ae911truth.org/evidence/faqs/365-faq-5-what-was-the-molten-metal-seen-pouring-out-of-the-south-tower-minutes-before-its-collapse

Temperatures anywhere near that hot would've permanently damaged the excavator and prevent it from operating. The hydraulic fluid in the excavator is designed to operate at room temperature and while even below water boiling temperatures would damage the entire system.

https://www.machinerylubrication.com/Read/772/hydraulic-equipment-reliability

Hydraulic fluid temperatures above 82°C (180ºF) damage most seal compounds and accelerate oil degradation. A single overtemperature event of sufficient magnitude can permanently damage all the seals in an entire hydraulic system, resulting in numerous leaks.

The by-products of thermal degradation of the oil (soft particles) can cause reliability problems such as valve-spool stiction and filter clogging.

[mes]

Are you serious or just willfully ignorant?

Not everything that glows is hot. And regardless, a few pieces of glowing metal does not turn the towers into dust.